I think there would be an assumption that that is mostly who we would attract. But I certainly would not make it illegal to be another religion, or no religion at all. I would never agree to that. That's what makes the Christian foundation of our nation so beautiful. We respect each other's religion and welcome the values and morals they all share. Freedom of religion is essential as originally defined, not as it is defined today.
We may be talking about a fine line here. Many different folks came to this country when it was an explicitly Christian nation. And while I understand the freedom of/from religion aspects of the debate, something needs to be stated explicitly from the gitgo so that Christianity does not come under attack from the new government.
I agree, but I would definitely support an amendment defining the Nation as specifically christian, based on the gospel of Jesus Christ, though not preferring on particular denomination above another.
Then you might broadly define Christianity by enumerating historic Christian doctrines such as the trinity, the bodily/physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, the deity of Jesus, the deity and personality of the Holy Spirit, the existence of heaven and hell, and maybe a few others.
But I would keep that statement of faith very basic and fundamental, leaving room for various denominations to co-exist with any given state/community modeled after their denomination.