Moore is Less Than Truthful (reviewer nails Mikey)

GET ready for the Fahrenheit 9/11 onslaught and, I safely predict, unprecedented levels of sycophancy for Michael Moore's newest agitprop. No Niger uranium WMD lies here! Moore's "documentary" will be gushed over regardless of how crazy the claims or how distorted the "facts".

Moore has cleverly set the stage for the propaganda offensive by suggesting that the distribution of his "documentary" has been sabotaged by Disney – a blatant lie uncritically now picked up by our local media. Moore has been one of the most prominent beneficiaries of what Roger Simon – the Hollywood screenwriter, novelist and blogger – has coined "the politics of the last five minutes".

Moore's Academy Award-winning Bowling for Columbine has, by definition, dropped off the radar of the "politics of the last five minutes" – but those of us with some memory left still recall those ominous pictures of the US bombers taking off in the Kosovo war in 1999. The dark implication was that the Boeing corporation – spookily nearby the Columbine massacre school – was, as the destructive representatives of US imperialism, all of a piece with those schoolboy mass murderers.

Moore's "documentary" didn't show that the Boeing factory near Columbine made weather satellites, not missiles. Nor did he take the trouble to explain that the Kosovo intervention was concerned with the rather more grown-up task of the prevention of genocide in the former Yugoslavia. Tony Blair and Bill Clinton courageously pre-empted the UN Security Council which was paralysed in the face of genocide – a familiar pose for that body. Does Moore stop to explain any of this? This was the awful truth that would have exposed Moore's message for the fraud that it was.

But why should thousands of slaughtered Kosovars spoil Moore's box office? What was even more breathtaking was Moore's presidential endorsement of General Wesley Clark – the military commander whom Clinton placed in charge of the Kosovo campaign. Once again, any regrets? Not a bit.

Moore's "documentary" claims may not be true, but to use John Pilger's formulation explaining the left-wing tabloid Daily Mirror's fabricated pictures of British soldiers mistreating Iraqi prisoners – "They may not be true, but what they represent is true." If the objective is anti-Americanism at all costs, it's a small price to pay to overlook inconvenient "facts".

Last week, Christopher Hitchens nailed Moore and the European intellectual climate which gave rise to this fawning phenomenon. "Speaking here in my capacity as a polished, sophisticated European as well," Hitchens said, "it seems to me the laugh here is on the polished, sophisticated Europeans. They think Americans are fat, vulgar, greedy, stupid, ambitious and ignorant and so on. And they've taken as their own, as their representative American, someone who actually embodies all of those qualities."

In a world where "representations" trump reality, however, it's no wonder that Moore's "documentary" was awarded the top prize at Cannes yesterday. This is the same mindset that regards the disgraceful treatment of Iraqi prisoners as the moral equivalent of the act of Islamist fanatics in hacking off the head of a non-combatant in Iraq. Moore's indignant "anti-imperialism" over Iraq makes a convenient existential leap right over Saddam's republic of fear and the 200,000 mass graves, just as he silently omitted the Kosovo genocide, so as not to blunt the drama of his "documentary" sequence.

Moore is on record as hailing the already grotesquely misdescribed "resistance" as the equivalent of the minute men – the American revolutionaries – a statement so lacking in seriousness as to border on the unhinged. But don't hold your breath for Moore to be pressed on this.

Nor will watching Moore give anyone the slightest inkling that the real agenda of the Islamo-fascists is to make he wretched of the earth more wretched. Better to ignore the awful truth of this medieval reactionary force – even out of their own mouths – in the interests of a warm and fuzzy trip down memory lane.

Those tempted by Moore's latest flick would be better served by treating themselves to the latest movie from another old leftie – Canadian Denys Arcand's brilliant Barbarian Invasions. Arcand's characters – not all that unlike Moore – warmly remember the intellectual fashions of their enjoyable, if somewhat misspent, baby boomer youth as their friend, Remy, the philosopher and self-described "sensual socialist", waits to die. Remy recounts a meeting in the early 1970s with a beautiful young woman from China who he tried to chat up with fawning praise for Mao and the Red Guards. The woman, who had lived the nightmare that was the Cultural Revolution and was all too familiar with the genuine article, recoils in horror at Remy's disconnected pitch. As he recalls these follies, Remy at least has the insight and humour to suggest that the Chinese woman's horror was perfectly intelligible. He and his pals laugh over the fact there was only one self-loathing "ism" they didn't embrace in the '60s and '70s – "cretinism". Pity we can't say the same for Michael Moore.

G'day, Byron!

Moore has been one of the most prominent beneficiaries of what Roger Simon – the Hollywood screenwriter, novelist and blogger – has coined "the politics of the last five minutes".

-----------------------------------------------------------

Last week, Christopher Hitchens nailed Moore and the European intellectual climate which gave rise to this fawning phenomenon. "Speaking here in my capacity as a polished, sophisticated European as well," Hitchens said, "it seems to me the laugh here is on the polished, sophisticated Europeans. They think Americans are fat, vulgar, greedy, stupid, ambitious and ignorant and so on. And they've taken as their own, as their representative American, someone who actually embodies all of those qualities."

As Bono (or John F'n al-Q'erry would say, "F'n Brilliant!"

Did Michael Moore violate California gun laws?
Donald Kilmer
=====
Just came across an article that has Mr. Moore admitting that he had tried to give a handgun to Mr. Heston during his "interview" for the movie Bowling for Columbine. (The facts come from the April 2003 issue of America's First Freedom, Don Kates gave me this issue during my recent visit to his home, thank Don. The title of the article is "Sliming America" by James O.E. Norell)

Seems there might be a couple of crimes here, although SOL may have passed, but the action is tolled until the gov't did or should have learned of the transgression. So maybe someone can get a sympathetic DA to arrest this guy, or at least investigate the gun crimes listed below.

Mr. Moore claims he was "just in L.A." to track down the manufacturer of the gun that was used to kill the little girl in Detroit. He admits that he put a gun in a paper bag and offered it as a gift to Mr. Heston.

Now, everybody knows that an out of state resident cannot legally buy a hand gun. So Mr. Moore either had a California resident buy the gun for him, which is a straw purchase; or he falsified documents stating he was a California resident. (Unless he is a California resident, but I thought he was a resident of Michigan.)

The alternative, is that he brought a gun to California from another jurisdiction where he purchased it legally. But handgun importers must register handguns brought into the State of California; failure to do so within a specific time is a crime.

So Mr. Moore's lawful possession/acquision of the handgun he tried to give Mr. Heston is at least questionable.

A wholly different crime is committed whey Mr. Moore tries to give the gun to Mr. Heston. Firearm transfers in California - especially handguns - must go through a licensed transfer dealer. Do we have an attempt to violate CA Penal Code section 12072? Conviction of this misdemeanor, now carries a 10 year prohibition on the right to own a firearm in California. See Penal Code 12021(c).

Did Mr. Moore transport this concealable weapon in a locked container pursuant to Penal Code section 12025? Doesn't sound like it if he offered it to Mr. Heston in a paper bag. Unless of course Mr. Moore transported the hand gun in a locked container, then took out on Mr. Heston's property, then put it in a paper bag to give to Mr. Heston. That doesn't seem likely.

Finally, if Mr. Moore planned all these events with his producers, cameramen and various other toadies, they are all guilty of conspiracy to violate California's gun laws. Which, the last time I looked at the statute book, is a felony.

I am not aware of a First Amendment exception to our state's gun laws, although there are permits that film crews can get for the dramatic use of firearms in movies and TV productions. Want to bet Mr. Moore did not pull such a permit from the Beverly Hills Police Department for his little stunt at Mr. Heston's residence?

In my humble opinion, there is enough here to get a search warrant and a copy of the tape (which by the way did not make it into the film) of Mr. Moore trying to hand the gun to Mr. Heston.

And gee, if save just one child's life by making an example of Mr. Moore and his irresponsible use of a hand gun, won't you all just feel warm and fuzzy?

Donald Kilmer
=====

<< .... Christopher Hitchens nailed Moore and the European "intellectual" climate which gave rise to this fawning phenomenon. "Speaking here in my capacity as a polished, sophisticated European as well," Hitchens said, "it seems to me the laugh here is on the polished, sophisticated Europeans. They think Americans are fat, vulgar, greedy, stupid, ambitious and ignorant and so on. And they've taken as their own, as their representative American, someone who actually embodies all of those qualities." .... Remy .... and his pals laugh over the fact there was only one self-loathing "ism" they didn't embrace in the '60s and '70s – "cretinism". Pity we can't say the same for Michael Moore. >> Steyn-esque. Welcome back, By -- Great to know you're alive and kicking -- and to see an intelligent piece in Peking Murdoch's Australian. Wonders never cease. Love to you and to yours. Blessings -- Brian BUMPping

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.