Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hydrogen Fuel Systems (Corvette!)
United Nuclear Research and Development ^ | current (5/04) | staff

Posted on 05/26/2004 9:48:04 AM PDT by Rebelbase

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: bat1816
I've seen other companies researching using hydrogen as a solid and that makes much more sense to me.

That's what this article is about.
21 posted on 05/26/2004 10:35:45 AM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sd-orf

google isn't God.


22 posted on 05/26/2004 10:38:55 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Powerball is a company that makes metal-hydride systems to store hydrogen and release on demand. Very interesting stuff.
23 posted on 05/26/2004 10:43:57 AM PDT by wingnutx (Tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bat1816
Who would want compressed gas cylinders in their car. Major accident waiting to happen. I've seen other companies researching using hydrogen as a solid and that makes much more sense to me.

Uh, that is exactly what this article is saying.

24 posted on 05/26/2004 10:47:32 AM PDT by wingnutx (Tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
btw, if you want your 'viking kitties' link to work, use THIS link :)
25 posted on 05/26/2004 10:50:13 AM PDT by wingnutx (Tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

wonder if they'd add the system to my 'Vette for free? ... hehe (for testing purposes, of course!)


26 posted on 05/26/2004 11:39:47 AM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Reading all these comments leaves me kind of disillusioned. Just because liberals like environmentally friendly fuels, doesn't mean we cant like them too.

Isn't striving for better efficiency a conservative ideal? Isn't removing our dependancy on foreign oil a conservative ideal?

Internal combustion engines are only about 25% efficient. They are a mature technology that won't get much better than they already are.

Hydrogen fuels are a fledgling technology that will improve tremendously in the years to come. They are the future.

I get the feeling that some of you didn't pay any attention to the facts mentioned in the article above. Storing hydrogen in hydrides essentially makes the fuel no longer hydrogen until it is needed. If any of you are welders, you could make the comparison to acetylene. Acetylene is obtained from calcium carbide. Calcium carbide is a relativey safe and stable substance. Just add water and voila, you have acetylene gas.

Storing hydrogen in hydrides is akin to storing acetylene in calcium carbide.

Some of you stated that production of hydrogen just consolidates the source of pullution to the utility company. You obviuosly didn't read the section on solar and wind generation of electricity for electrolysis.

How often do you refill your gas tank? Twice a week? Why is it such a bad idea to be able to produce your own fuel in your garage for the one time cost of equipment which will get cheaper and cheaper? You could have a hydrogen generator in you garage that could harness the 1500 watts per square meter of sunlight that is constantly making hydrogen. Why is this such a loony idea?

If you ask me alternative fuels is an issue that is ripe to be stolen from the liberals, the same way they co-opted civil rights in the 60's. We could do a much better job.


27 posted on 05/26/2004 11:53:52 AM PDT by Oblongata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wingnutx

My corrupted kitties link works fine, thank-you very much. :-)


28 posted on 05/26/2004 12:11:08 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Just thought you might like the original as well :)


29 posted on 05/26/2004 12:21:18 PM PDT by wingnutx (Tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RealPiedPiper

Lots of kneejerk reaction on hydrogen threads, for and against.


30 posted on 05/26/2004 12:24:18 PM PDT by wingnutx (Tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

That big fireball you see in the Hindenberg picture is mostly the paint burning. Hydrogen flames are invisible. Firefighters probe for suspected hydrogen flames with a broom to avoid walking right into them.


31 posted on 05/26/2004 12:28:28 PM PDT by wingnutx (Tanstaafl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

You think of Led Zepplin I? The humanity.


32 posted on 05/26/2004 12:30:15 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States

You beat me to it by a mile.


33 posted on 05/26/2004 12:31:01 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
lol

But I thought it was #2.

We can share the glory.

;o

34 posted on 05/26/2004 12:45:15 PM PDT by No Blue States
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: No Blue States

Number 1 in B & W on the back cover. Number 2 in color on the front. Both solid and still strong.


35 posted on 05/26/2004 12:49:35 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
1. If you choose to store the Hydrogen as a compressed gas, you'll need HUGE tanks, and many of them, since Hydrogen isn't very dense, so a tank really can't hold all that much.

Way off topic, this is why the first stage of the Saturn V rocket burned LOX and Kerosene ....

36 posted on 05/26/2004 12:51:49 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Oh, you silly things! Don't you know Sylvia Browne says cars will be powered by atomic batteries and will float on water?

http://www.sylvia.org/home/2000plus.cfm


37 posted on 05/26/2004 12:59:09 PM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

The Hindenberg didn't explode because of the hydrogen gas, as it turns out. It burned because 2 of the ingredients used in the canvas dope for the outer skin, namely powdered aluminum and iron oxide, seem to be 2 of the 5 major components used in fuel for the space shuttle. The fireball you see in the photo was actually the skin of the airship burning, which was ignited, most likely by lightning. The hydrogen gas burned nearly invisible, well above the structure of the airship.


38 posted on 05/26/2004 2:12:30 PM PDT by kylaka (The Clintons are the democRATS crack cocaine. They know they're bad for them, they just can't stop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
but whatcha gonna do with all that excess Oxygen you're gonna be left with?

You vent it to the outside. It's not like O2 is a pollutant, or anything. Green plants make lots of it.

39 posted on 05/26/2004 2:35:02 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RealPiedPiper
I agree that hydrogen power (though maybe not all alternative fuel sources) is an issue ripe to be taken from liberals. However, I have doubts about whether it is ready for mass use. I would love to see one of these conversion systems in action and would like to know the following: 1) how does the cost of hydrogen produced at home compare to gasoline after figuring in the cost of your generator, maintenance, and increased electricity use; 2) How does the performance of the hydrogen Corvette compare to a gasoline Corvette; 3) how bulky is the hydride storage system; 4) what are the safety issues of home hydrogen production; and 5) how much gasoline does the car use during its warm-up stage (most trips I make are 5-10 minutes, I might not even get the thing warmed up before stopping).

This is not a hydrogen vehicle by the way, but a hybrid that uses hydrogen only after running on gasoline for a while (another thing, how does climate affect the performance of the system?).

With that lengthy qualifier, though, I am all for this system. Who would have thought that those ads in the back of Popular Science offering Tandy and HeathKit home computer kits would be the predecessor of the PC industry? What could this lead to?
40 posted on 05/26/2004 2:37:35 PM PDT by Law is not justice but process
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson