[TrebleRebel]

Tenet talks (In February 2004) about a classified paper stating the meeting cannot be proven or disproven.

[TrebleRebel]

ping

[jpl]

Interesting. If it says that the meeting is considered neither confirmed nor denied, I wonder what in the document needs to be classified.

[Jabba the Nutt]

The Czechs stand 100% behind their information. I do not understand why the CIA and especially George W Bush do not trump this evidence. Bush is getting slammed daily without response that there was no Saddam connection to 9-11. Al-Ani proves the falsity of that claim. Why the silence?

[ravingnutter]

May 2004 - New evidence of Saddam link to 9-11: records indicate Atta meeting with Iraqi official in Prague

My previous post on why the disputed Prague meeting doesn't matter

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Account Links 9/11 to '93 WTC Attack

The Baluch Connection: Is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed tied to Baghdad?

[ravingnutter]

A huge list of articles on the Al Qaeda/Hussein connection can be found at the following link:

Bin Laden/Hussein Connection Reports

[Shermy]

The biggest B.S. in the Newsweek piece is trying to frame this as "Chalabi" information.

I've followed the story closely. The information came from the Czechs, with Czech officials...using their own names...saying it probably occured.

The fact that the "Chalabi" ruse is being thrown out means the disinformation forces are playing on constructed liberal-left bugaboos to dissuade further examination from the fact.

It's not just the doubt, it's the lie. Bad, or almost as bad as NYTimes' James Risen creating or relaying the blatant lie that Vaclav Havel "quietly" or otherwise told Bush the meeting did not take place.

Troubling indeed. Is the Newsweek piece written by Isikoff? He's the usual sucker for this disinformation.