Moore announced the existence of the tape. That alone should raise a red flag. He is a media savvy, highly unscrupulous individual who undoubtedly is thinking a few steps ahead, and of course he is looking to damage Bush. It's naive to think that he didn't begin executing a hidden agenda the moment he made the announcement.
What could he possibly know about Berg's death? He was not there when the poor man had his head sliced off.
My guess is thw data on the tape is totally benign, meaningless and extraneous to the investigation. If it was something that could actually get him into trouble do you think he'd be announcing it? Hell no.
He is baiting the FBI, hoping to get them to do something stupid so he then cry "HARASSMENT!" and make a big splash in the media about how the Patriot Act is stripping us of all our freedoms. The FBI should not rise to the bait.
Ignore him.
Now, I suppose it could have been Michael Berg who told Salon. And I agree that the FBI should tread cautiously. BUT Michael Moore had better be treading cautiously, too. He could be close to breaking the law.
I think Moore is about to give himself a big black eye-we should do everything we can to put a spotlight on that shiner.
Not according to salon he didn't:
Word of the footage reached Salon through a source unaffiliated with Moore, or his film, "Fahrenheit 9/11,"
Granted, salon's not exactly the most trustworthy source.