The article clearly states 'footage unused in the Berg film'
I take that to mean the film of the 'beheading'
That's the way I read it. It doesn't suggest a previous interview to me.
Well, that sounds pretty suspicious to me: why would Moore have taken the time to interview a small-fry like Berg and how did he come to know him? Did he talk about where he intended to travel or who he intended to see? What was Mikey's interest in interviewing him? It seems to me to be more than a little strange that such a high-profile opponent of the war as Moore would have footage of Berg before he even went to Iraq. What could he have possibly hoped to gain from such an interview?
Do you have an article with that information? What are the odds Michael Moore interviews a guy--a guy who has already had fishy ties to terrorists--and this guy winds up murdered in Iraq? I'm not even sure where that will lead. Moore involved with the terrorists? Moore creating a "human shield" type and getting him to put himself in harm's way? It all sounds ruinous for Moore.
please tell us where you got this information from. Surely a l5 minute interview with Berg before he went to Iraq would not be referred to as 'unused in the film' - THE FILM means the beheading video, right?