[YaYa123]

Is even Michael Moore low down dirty enough to lie about something like this? I mean, this is really nasty business. He's a liar, but this isn't pulling a fast one on Michael Eisner, this is life and death.

Do I have this right? Moore is claiming to have somehow gotten hold of video of the captured Berg, video that was not used in the video released to the Arab tv channel. Am I also right that the only way he could have gotten it was from the Arab television channel, directly from the terrorists, or as he would no doubt claim, anonymously in the mail?

If I'm making the right assumption, then the question is why was he the one to get the video? Seems apparent, the video "source" thought he would be the one most likely to use it to help their cause.

So I'm thinking what on a Berg video would hurt us the most: To hear Berg denounce the president, the war, and the country. Even if done under torture, which could easily be edited out.

[Rokurota]

Do I have this right? Moore is claiming to have somehow gotten hold of video of the captured Berg...

The article doesn't make it clear. It could be before he was captured.