Amendment is no different than any other part of the
Constitution; subject to the same changing political,
cultural, and technological influences."
Justice Ginsberg pinko 
Posted on 05/27/2004 6:54:18 PM PDT by wagglebee
His two replies to me were more than enough clarification for me. I've got my polygraph on the 7th now, had to postpone it because of work sched. conflicts, and that puts my psych off 'til July unfortanately, so it looks like the earliest I'll be in the academy (assuming all goes well/knocking on a big ole 2x4) is Sept..
I have never heard anyone praise Nichols and McVeigh. Nor would I let it pass unchallenged.
What sort of people do you hang out with that you have heard this, hmmmm?
Because I'm a conservative and I believe conservatives have a special obligation to let everyone know that bombing Federal Buildings is not a tenant of the conservative philosophy.
I doubt anyone here has ever been to a meeting where Nichols and Mcveigh were praised unless it were a room full of DNC stategists plotting Clinton's comeback. Are you one of them?
Bite me ya POS ya had your chance to own up to your own pile of crap ya spewed here. I hit the abuse button on yer trollin DU ass. My last to ya loser.
That's good. By making that statement you might have influenced some others to speak up if they ever hear someone defending what Nichols and McVeigh did.
Stay Safe !
Justice Ginsberg pinko
Evil village idiot flame baiter?
"asbestos head"?
Do you denounce your former position toward NAMBLA or not?
(One idiotic non sequitor deserves another.)
Damn! I guess I just don't get it. I thought I was an 'average' firearm enthusiast who understood the meaning of "shall not be infringed". The RKBA referred to the state-of-the-art firearms of its day, in the hands of competent citizens. I am denied even the state-of-the-art small arms of my day. (We are not taliking ICBMs here, just rifles and pistols.)
Infringed has not changed in meaning.
I do not advocate the murder of anyone, especially women and children. Funny how many who would take the right to own a specific rifle from me advocate the murder of babies in the womb.
The Constitution was set down (especially when taken in historical context) in plain language. I don't worship it, but I do understand that it was intended to frame out a Government, which properly constrained by the terms of the document, would lessen the likelihood of the concentration of power and the tyranny which would be the result. Human nature hasn't changed.
Some changes have been added as amendments. That is the process by which the framework is changed, one which is intentionally slow, unwieldy, and requires an overwhelming majority in favor.
With this 'living document which needs to be reinterpreted' crap do we deny ourselves the absolute framework which the founders intended to safeguard our liberty. Thus begins the slide toward the abyss.
You, sir, are an idiot... and probably a Troll.
I will go on record condemning the terrorists who bombed the Murrah Building... however this thread is about determining just exactly WHO, in addition to Nichols and McVeigh, those terrorists are.
The evidence is pointing to a conspiracy of Arab terrorists with some American Benedict Arnolds. McVeigh even published a apologia in which he railed about American Foreign Policy vis-a-vis Iraq and Islamic countries... not the Waco debacle... not the Second Amendment.
McVeigh's and Nichols' involvement in the Murrah Building's destruction and the murder of 168 men, women and children and the maiming of many others was NOT about their supporting the Second Amendment to the Constitution. It is becoming more and more apparent that the Murrah Building was destroyed by the ENEMIES of our Constitution and the Second Amendment!
Okay... but watch carefully, because I'm only going to do this once:
< < Fire_eye dons gas mask, body armor, and digs deep slit trench... > >
The following
"The average gun enthusiast understands that the 2nd Amendment is no different than any other part of the Constitution; subject to the same changing political, cultural, and technological influences."
needs to be restated as follows:
< < Fire_eye eyes the slit trench calculatingly... > >
"It's A Living, Breathing Document"
< < Fire_eye DIVES for the slit trench, laughing insanely, one microsecond ahead of the incoming wall of flying lead, mortar rounds, rockets, artillery rounds, and a Frenchman lobbed by a trebuchet which completely disintegrates "bayourod" into his/her/its component atoms... > >
(WELL... he ASKED...)
And a war on terror wouldn't have exactly fit into his plans to be the great middle east peace maker for that pulitzer prize he tried to con everyone into winning.
McVeigh and Nichols were not 2nd amendment worshippers. Give it up.
"And maybe in the future when you're at a meeting and hear someone praising Nichols and McVeigh "
Are you accusing several people here, with no reason, as frequenting places that hold crowds who praise the likes of those two? If so, you're over the line, a place you seem to enjoy. People who aren't used to your "demeanor" might be offended. You don't intend to be OFFENSIVE, now do you, bayourod?
Man. Just like the JFK murder, we'll never know all the real facts, details of this .....
Jayna Davis: OKC and WTC Bombers Met in Philippines
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
