[Hoplite]

there has never been any question in my opinion or in the article that I published that this camp was anything other than a grim place at which there were beatings, there were killings and there were rapes. There has never been any question of that. We have never argued contrary to that. - Michael Hume under cross-examination.

I do not say that they at any time were able to leave and there - you know, there were fences, there were guards, which we have seen here, armed guards. - Thomas Deichmann under cross-examination.

That's the author and the publisher of your cited article recanting the contents of said article when they were given the opportunity to defend it in court.

So what's your point in trotting out this particular example of discredited propaganda?

That if you retell a lie enough times it will become true?
That "Living Marxism" is still a worthy source?

What exactly are you trying to do here Incorrigible?

I tell you to keep your uninformed opinion to yourself, but you just won't listen, will you.

[vooch]

Hoplite are you still trying to confuse people with English Libel law ?

As you well know, The Judge instructed the Jury not to consider whether ITV reporters lied, the Jury only was to determine if the ITV deliberately lied.

The Jury decided that the ITV reporters were too stupid to have deliberately lied, but they agreed that the ITV film was a lie.

Net, Net the English Judge agreed that the Photos were lies. He made it very clear in his instructions.