Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gooseanders
paul said that wings sucked?

"Early Wings were pretty rough, not terribly good," admits Paul.

Seems pretty clear to me. And I agree with him, they weren't terribly good, or in other words, they sucked.

7 posted on 06/02/2004 11:27:55 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Joe Hadenuf

"Early Wings were pretty rough, not terribly good," admits Paul.

"Seems pretty clear to me. And I agree with him, they weren't terribly good, or in other words, they sucked."

he also said the same thing about early beatles. do you think that the beatles sucked?


10 posted on 06/02/2004 11:36:59 PM PDT by gooseanders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Joe Hadenuf

They were better than 95% of the guano that's on the radio today.


11 posted on 06/03/2004 12:06:35 AM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (4 months in the Mekong don't make up for 30 years of lies and shameful votes since then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson