"Sorry, but you ain't one of the 'calm voices of reason'." ... What is reasonable about taking three days to dilate a pregnant woman's cervix, then yank an alive sensing child by the leg (sometime ripping the little one's leg off in the process, prior to killing the child) down through the cervical os until only the writhing little one's head is lodged within the woman's uterus, then jamming blunt-tipped scissors into the braincase of the struggling baby, opening the jaws to make room for a suction cannula or other trocar to remove the dying child's brain? You want calm in the face of a holocaust, reason in the face of insane inhumane slaughter? You sick apologist, go back under your deceitful slime of pond scum.
Thank you.
If you examine my remarks, you will see that I neither argued for nor against abortion. My point was that the author of the article does the pro-life movement a disservice by trying to represent it. You are obviously too emotionally involved in the topic to carry on a rational conversation.
. . .Additionally, some Planned Parenthood and National Abortion Federation facilities actually maintain web sites and produce advertising materials telling minor girls that their sexual activity can be covered up by patronizing one of their family planning clinics.30
Earlier in this report we listed a few of the factors driving the epidemic of adult men sexually exploiting underage girls, but what our investigation has shown is that the single most important factor is the willingness of Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation to conceal these crimes.