Sure you do, these posts bring out bigger
nuts than Planter's Mr. Peanut.
"'I believe one of Planned Parenthood’s objectives is for girls and women to engage in illicit sex as often as possible, so as to increase the odds they’ll get pregnant and have to abort.'
Someone's train has disappeared around the bend. You don't usually see this kind of insanity on FR."
It's certainly an incindiery statement, but ask yourself for a moment, is it true? Cui bono? (That's about 50% of my known Latin, so I love to trot it out! If you don't know, it means "who benefits?") Sad but true, that "follow the money" is often sound advice.
Someday, all children will be safe from those monsters. Daniel predicted in Daniel 7:11, "Then, as I watched, the monster was killed and its body cremated in a roaring fire."
It’s interesting that some abortionists incinerate aborted babies on site.
Isn’t turnabout fair play? With no pain relief, of course.
I'm pro-life, but this implied threat makes me very uncomfortable.
How much of Planned Parenthood's annual budget do you think is financed by abortion?
Well, look at it this way. Do you really think that the pro-abortionists want abortion to be safe, legal and RARE? If it were rare, say 1% of women had abortions, instead of about a third, then it would be an aberration instead of a commonplace; women who had abortions would be aberrant and it would be far easier to persuade the public that it was unnnecessary, and to ban it.
Married, chaste women don't have many abortions.
Mrs VS