Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

J'ACCUSE: "President [Bush] approved the leaking of the name of the CIA agent" claims John Loftus
transcribed radio broadcast | June 3, 2004 | Batchelor & Loftus

Posted on 06/04/2004 6:10:38 AM PDT by Boot Hill

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Boot Hill

that stuff leaks, it always leaks. especially if the witnesses are out to damage Bush - they leak. everybody leaks.


61 posted on 06/04/2004 9:16:16 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mware

I don't think so.

The thing about Loftus that is confusing - no one is a bigger hawk then him. He wants to blow everybody up - Syria, Iran, Hezzbollah, everyone you can think off.


62 posted on 06/04/2004 9:18:37 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
"they leak. everybody leaks."

Some categories of leaks can be prevented with Depends, others can be prevented when the witnesses are reminded that leaks are felonies punishable by substantial fines and jail time. Those that say, don't know. Those that know, don't say.

In this highly charged political year, the motivation to start false rumors about what the grand jury may or may not be hearing, is overwhelming.

--Boot Hill

63 posted on 06/04/2004 9:25:29 AM PDT by Boot Hill (Candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo, candy-gram for Osama bin Mongo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Haven't listened to many talking
heads of late...any posts on FR
about this?


64 posted on 06/04/2004 9:38:25 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

I haven't needed to look on FR for it, having heard the same thing from the multiple sources I've cited above. I don't know if there is or not.


65 posted on 06/04/2004 9:42:49 AM PDT by Badeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell; Allan

Bush "approved" a leak?

Even got involved in this stuff?

I really doubt any president would. Plus this feeds into Wilson's self-importance - he was leaking BEFORE the NYTimes article.

Fantasies. More likely, Tenet or someone closer to him was the spiller, and they've been deflecting ever since. The leak of possible "white house" names are too close to the usual lib bugaboos. All the libs have this election season is ghosts.

Aas for Rove, I don't doubt he said "fair game." But AFTER Novak's article. Ie, post-Novak actions are being conflated with pre-Novak "leaks".

But maybe someone can ask Loftus this: Have you ever actually read what Novak said about the sources? (does he have an e-mail?) Is Novak describing a Cheney guy? Why would the "leak" be to an anti-war journalist, someone who agreed with Wilson? What about the intelligence officials who leaked to Newsday?

Sounds like Beltway B.S. ...

But maybe not...


66 posted on 06/04/2004 9:55:01 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson