Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shoplifting Charge Dogs Iraq General(Karpinski)
CBS (channel 11 Dallas/Fort Worth) ^ | 06/03/04 | N/A

Posted on 06/04/2004 9:23:39 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: HenryLeeII
When the BG promotion list comes out, those on it are to be promoted sequentiality. That's how date-of-rank comes into play. Frocking is done when someone is put into a job that calls for a specific rank. Her date of rank would still fall in line with the sequence of the promotion list.
41 posted on 06/04/2004 2:25:40 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: William Tell

All good points. When I worked at Army Selection Boards (many years ago) the BG board ran across an 06 who had received a Letter of Reprimand for shoplifting a set of uniform unit crests at the PX while attending the Army War College. It made the boards task easy. They just voted him down with a recommendation for him to "Show Cause" for continued service. L'sOR and GO Article 15's are common ways commanders send messages to selection boards.

In Karpinski's case, I understand she was already on the promotion list. She fell through the cracks. There is no way she would have stayed on the BG promotion list unless someone high up overrode DA.


42 posted on 06/04/2004 2:38:37 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Not even free perfume could help that woman. Bless her heart.


43 posted on 06/04/2004 2:41:37 PM PDT by BigWaveBetty (You're not the boss of me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boxsford

Clinton dishonored the military by decimating the officer corps.Remember Tailhook? Well the sackings and the forced retirements did not end with the admirals but went through all the services.


44 posted on 06/04/2004 3:28:27 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (Ong lam hanh huong di La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

She looks like Henrietta,the witch in the fruit cellar,in The Evil Dead 2.


45 posted on 06/04/2004 4:24:12 PM PDT by Uncle Meat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero; dorben
About the time Tail Hook was all you heard about I found out that the granddaughter of a friend was being "Given" to other Navy Officers by her father, a Navy Officer, at conventions etc.

She was an extraordinarily beautiful 13 year old who looked 19 or 20, and she never told her grandmother who was raising her, she told a Male Cousin with whom she was also having sex. He told Grandma and the proverbial you know what hit the fan.

But, really nothing ever happened. Everyone was intimidated by the Officer and Gentleman and his gang Grandma took the girl and left the state.

A real shock to my system, as I was raising a granddaughter who was a friend of the girl in question and would have castrated the Bastard and his friends!
46 posted on 06/04/2004 4:59:14 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts (Keep your eye on the donut not on the hole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts

The forceouts were not limited to the participants in that annual event which should have been scotched years earlier. Clinton found he had a good thing going and spent a couple of years eliminating officers who were not suitable for his new military, one that wouldn't fight wars any more but would perform social services around the world. Initially he eliminated all the flight admirals whether they had been to Tailhook or not. Those were the ones with the experience and the knowledge of the aircraft.Then it just moved on through the rest of the military.


47 posted on 06/04/2004 5:12:12 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (Ong lam hanh huong di La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: smonk

SHE'S BEING SCAPEGOATED !!!11!!
IT'S ALL BUSH'S FAULT !11!


I love the concept of a general officer "being scapegoated" for actions taken by members of the enlisted ranks under her direct command.


48 posted on 06/04/2004 6:07:07 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Sorry .. this is not the Clinton Pentagon. And .. Linda Tripp was not a member of the military.

I don't approve of what the Pentagon did to Linda .. but it was the Clinton people who did it, and this incident has no relation to the Karpinsky issue.


49 posted on 06/05/2004 12:31:50 AM PDT by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: withteeth
That is definitely nine miles of rough road.
50 posted on 06/05/2004 12:42:32 AM PDT by dancusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny; Positive
Okay, I spoke with my source - a very senior chief warrant officer I'm very familiar with and trust implicity, who has had direct dealings with Karpinski, and what he said is that being "frocked" is passing a promotions board and being considered "promotable" but not yet being given the rank officially. Also, depending on the circumstances, the frocked officer can wear the insignia of the higher rank and be referred to such, for a given period of time. So, she is technically a "colonel (P)" - "colonel promotable." This is similar to the "battlefield promotions" you hear about when someone shoots from major to colonel to general in a matter of weeks or months, and then comes back down to a lower rank after the war or campaign ends.
51 posted on 06/07/2004 6:19:46 AM PDT by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

If this pig lifted a $22 bottle of perfume, I'm betting it was in a quart bottle. Now who could she smelling nice for in South Florida? Reno?


52 posted on 06/07/2004 6:26:25 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ThanhPhero
The only difference between what he did and shat Stalin did is he didn't shoot the officers. Now we are trying to fight a war with an army staffed by Clinton. In that sense, it IS Clinton's army.

So you're saying that "Clinton's Army" did a pretty good job of kicking the crap out of Saddam Hussein?

53 posted on 06/07/2004 6:26:28 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

To some extent that is true, but Clinton could not have done this war at all. The women clogging up the supply chains and being a terrific additional cost is Clinton's army which W has not chosn to fix. The officer corps is pretty thin and W's people have managed to get the best that are left into the proper positions and the promotions are filling the holes. In one respect all the cuts of the Clinton era improved today's army by kind of clearing the decks for the new stuff. It Algore had succeeded the cigar warrior, of course the decks would have been cleared right off the ship and Algore would be clearing the hold.


54 posted on 06/07/2004 11:00:31 AM PDT by ThanhPhero (Ong la nguoi di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: HenryLeeII
Hi - You caused me to google "frocked," I found slight differences in what your friend told you.

According to what I found, when a Colonel is nominated by the President for promotion to Brigadier General or Generals are nominated for additional stars and passed by the Congress, they are called Brigadier General Select or Brigadier General Frocked. They are given a "line number" which specifies when the promotion will take effect. Often until that date they are pinned with their star(s) and addressed as General but they continue to receive Colonel pay and officially their rank is Colonel(P).

I was in the military and this is completely different from a "field promotion." In fact I don't believe there have been any field promotions since WWII. Those are given as implied in the field and usually only when the manpower resources are being depleted.

55 posted on 06/07/2004 12:51:20 PM PDT by Positive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson