[Psycho_Bunny]

Legal experts say that without the reporters' confirmation under oath, the articles are considered hearsay and are not admissible in court. If confirmed, the information can be used as evidence.

If this is true - that they are being called to attest to the words they placed in the public domain for money, obstructing in any way is truly reprehensable.

[kcvl]

A killing in Egypt that might have taken place at the direction of Abdel Rahman, if Lynne Stewart made that direction public, as she is alleged to have done.

Stewart is accused of having communicated, instead, is an instruction to kill people.

Lynne Stewart is alleged to have gone public with a violent instruction that Rahman did not even bother camouflaging.