Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PM abolishes committee to eradicate Baath party
Iraqpress ^ | 06/05/04 | Iraqpress

Posted on 06/06/2004 9:10:27 AM PDT by Pikamax

PM abolishes committee to eradicate Baath party

Baghdad, Iraq Press, June 5, 2004 – The country’s new interim leader has decided to dissolve a committee the US occupation authorities had established to sack members of the Baath party and prevent them from holding public positions.

In one of his first rulings, Ayad Allawi abolished the Baath Eradication Commission, a body headed by Ahmad Jalabi, a member of the now-dissolved Governing Council.

The US-led administration of Iraq is to transfer the country’s sovereignty to Allawi’s government on June 30.

The interim prime minister opposed mass punishment of Saddam Hussein’s Baath party and also was against the decommissioning of the armed forces – decisions many now regard as major blunders by Washington.

Jalabi and his committee pursued their debaathification mercilessly and tens of thousands of Iraqis, many of them innocent of atrocities the ousted leader Saddam Hussein committed, lost their jobs and means to support their families.

The dissolution of the armed forces also added at least half a million soldiers and officers to the army of jobless Iraqis.

Iraqi observer cite the debaathification and abolishment of armed forces as among the reasons for the current escalation in attacks on US troops and Iraqi security forces.

Allawi’s decision to reverse the debaathification is a signal that the interim prime minister is keen to restore law and order through reconciliation.

At least 60,000 Iraqis have been directly affected by the debaathification policies.

Now, the new interim authorities face the uphill task of rehabilitating most of them.

In a sign of tolerance, Allawi’s new interim government includes four former members of Saddam Hussein’s Baath party.

Thamir Ghadhban, Leila Abdul-Latif, Tahir al-Bakkaa and Adnan al-Janabi, ministers of oil, labor, higher education and state respectively, played major roles during Saddam Hussein’s rule of the country.

Ipfront


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allawi; chalabi; debaathification; iraq

1 posted on 06/06/2004 9:10:27 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
In a sign of tolerance, Allawi’s new interim government includes four former members of Saddam Hussein’s Baath party.

Interesting.

I tempted to say, "Mr. Allawi, you'll be sorry!"

2 posted on 06/06/2004 9:20:19 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Ahmad Jalabi

Is that Chalabi?
3 posted on 06/06/2004 9:26:45 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (If 9/11 didn't change you, you're a bad human being)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
From everything I've seen, a lot of Baathists were only Baathists because they had no choice. When your choices are pledge loyalty or face poverty due to lack of work or MUCH worse you might be suprised at how attractive the loyalty option is. Not all Baathists were brutal killers, in fact the Dr. who led troops to Jessica Lynch was a Baathist.

I remember reading about a Japanese POW camp commander who was convicted of eating the livers of POWs. He served some 17 years on the Japanese Parliament after that due to the lack of qualified people. Thats a pretty extreme example.

In postwar Germany many former NAZIs served in govt after they renounced their affiliations with the national socialist party.

The options in Iraq are pretty limited so they have to make do with what they have.
4 posted on 06/06/2004 9:37:30 AM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

They'll be SORRRRRRY


5 posted on 06/06/2004 9:38:20 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan

Naw...this is just Arab think...nothing to it.


6 posted on 06/06/2004 9:40:12 AM PDT by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The New American - "A Republic, If You Can Keep It" - November 6, 2000 http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2000/11-06-2000/vo16no23_republic.htm The deliberations of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 were held in strict secrecy. Consequently, anxious citizens gathered outside Independence Hall when the proceedings ended in order to learn what had been produced behind closed doors. The answer was provided immediately. A Mrs. Powel of Philadelphia asked Benjamin Franklin, "Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" With no hesitation whatsoever, Franklin responded, "A republic, if you can keep it." This exchange was recorded by Constitution signer James McHenry in a diary entry that was later reproduced in the 1906 American Historical Review.
7 posted on 06/06/2004 9:44:10 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (Sane, and have the papers to prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
In postwar Germany many former Wehrmacht officers served in the Federal German armed forces.
8 posted on 06/06/2004 9:47:36 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
From everything I've seen, a lot of Baathists were only Baathists because they had no choice. When your choices are pledge loyalty or face poverty due to lack of work or MUCH worse you might be suprised at how attractive the loyalty option is. Not all Baathists were brutal killers, in fact the Dr. who led troops to Jessica Lynch was a Baathist.

This was the situation that Patton was dealing with in regards to Nazi Party membership in post war Germany. Anybody with any responsible job was required to be a Party member so the trick was to separate the technically competent Nazis-in-name-only from the political Nazis.

Of course, since Patton had such a gift for diplomatic speech, he compared Nazi Party membership to Republican and Democrat Party membership in the U.S. and was promptly relieved as the Military Governor of Bavaria. :-)

9 posted on 06/06/2004 9:53:37 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Patton was not too PC. He called them as he saw them. He was the best allied general, far ahead of Eisenhower and Montgomery. His political candor prevented him from getting too far with the high command. He was wanting to go on toward Moscow and capturing Stalin. The world would have been far better off if his advice had been folllwed.


10 posted on 06/06/2004 11:49:46 AM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meenie; Polybius

Patton was fortunate that he didn't have to live too long after WWII. I don't think he could have stomached the complete surrender of E Europe to the Soviets.


11 posted on 06/06/2004 3:43:35 PM PDT by ambrose (President Bush on Reagan: "His Work is Done and Now a Shining City Awaits Him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

This does not apply to any Baathist who has blood on their hands. They do need to watch out that socialism doesn't creep into their new country, and they really do need to outlaw the party itself.


12 posted on 06/06/2004 3:57:45 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson