Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
The activist says he considers sending children to government schools as "the grossest kind of sin...>/I>

Reminds me of the woman in California who pulled her children from public schools (in order to home school them) because she considered the schools to be a form of child abuse.

3 posted on 06/09/2004 5:02:13 AM PDT by Tom Bombadil (There are givers and takers. Be a giver and marry one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tom Bombadil

Well, schools in CA are a form of child abuse especially when they subject students to mandated homosexual indoctrination against their parents wishes. Can you imagine the confusion a student must feel when he learns one thing at home or in his church, and then when he attends a CA public school, he is practically ordered to "embrace" homosexuality and is mocked out if he doesn't, like the CA kids subjected to a Planned Parenthood exercise where students were singled out for their dissent? Or if he wears a t-shirt with a religious message on it condeming the practice of homosexuality he is suspended? I believe it's called cognitive dissonance. It sets up confusion and drives a wedge between the family and the school. It is child abuse.

I don't think this resolution will be passed, but it might wake some parents up to the fact that they should make sure that the schools they send their children to (public or private) are schools that they can trust. If they can't trust the schools to uphold their values, perhaps they should look elsewhere.


6 posted on 06/09/2004 7:05:24 AM PDT by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson