Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This guy is incredible, the libs are starting to strech now. Yeah, maybe Nancy Reagan will be on the Kerry team now. What a jackass.
1 posted on 06/09/2004 6:37:35 AM PDT by jazzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazzo

Conason is Michael Moore after 6 months of Ultra-Slimfast.


2 posted on 06/09/2004 6:41:52 AM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo

Conason should spend a year at Betty Ford.


3 posted on 06/09/2004 6:42:09 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYC GOP Chick

Looks like your favorite author has laid another turd on the table.


4 posted on 06/09/2004 6:42:17 AM PDT by sauropod (Which would you prefer? "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" or "I did not have sex with that woman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
I heard that Nancy may be speaking at the convention in a tribute to Reagan. Does anyone honestly believe she would use the opportunity to bash Bush? She is a smart woman.
I think Reagan's death may remind people of the importance of the presidency and as such many will start to pay more attention to the candidates. This cannot hurt Bush. Plus the suggestion that is was wrong for Bush/Cheney to honor Reagan on the website has me scratching my head.
5 posted on 06/09/2004 6:46:18 AM PDT by KJacob (No military in the history of the world has fought so hard and so often for the freedom of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo

I could only bear to skim it..Conason's eyebrows appear before me as in a nightmare if I dwell on him.


7 posted on 06/09/2004 6:47:40 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo

Unbelievable. Even the death of Ronald Reagan can be twisted into an attack on Bush. What a punk.


8 posted on 06/09/2004 6:47:49 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Torrance Ca....land of the flying monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo

Surprise, surprise, Joe Conason using any excuse to bash President Bush. Joe's ignorance is boundless.


10 posted on 06/09/2004 6:52:06 AM PDT by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo

I agree that this article is off track by far, but the premise that President Bush should be careful with trying to make comparison's to our 40th president. The reason is that he will fail if he does. What I have seen over the past week is that Reagan's vision of America was the driving force that made him a success. I do not see that vision in this President I see someone who has been lucky enough to be compared to Bill Clinton and Al Gore.


11 posted on 06/09/2004 6:53:26 AM PDT by THE MODERATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo

And this irate behavior that Nancy Reagan would direct at George W. Bush would be based on - what? Joe Conason has grasped at straws before, with predictable results. He manages to cause the straws to drown.

The best response to Joe Conason is just to allow him to keep on talking. It must be his eating mouth that is talking, because his rectal orfice has more native good sense, than to spill so much fecal matter....


17 posted on 06/09/2004 6:59:06 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JoeConason

Joe, do yourself a favor, take your meds.


18 posted on 06/09/2004 6:59:34 AM PDT by Requiem for Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
Joe Conason is such an ass!

Nancy's new White House china was donated, not paid for with tax payer money. Conason knows that. Just like the new china Eleanor Roosevelt chose during World War II, and like Jackie Kennedy chose during her regal "reign".

His snide "designer frocks" comment exposes his contempt for Nancy. (I don't believe Nancy ever had to coordinate her clothing to conceal deception. She never had hold a pink press conference!)

As far as warning President Bush about the ire of Nancy. Could he be more transparent in his mirror thinking? Hillary's the one who demands payback.
Hillary's the one with access to the FBI Files of her enemies.
And Hillary's probably the one who gave Joe the idea for this dastardly column!

Joe's intent is not to warn President Bush, it's to push his own agenda at the expense of Nancy Reagan. Never ask "how low can Joe go"? The bottomless pit of Hell awaits.

19 posted on 06/09/2004 7:01:49 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@God Blessed America With Ronald Reagan.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
Both Presidents passed ill-advised and unfair tax cuts

What a communistic moron to argue that 70% tax rates were a good/fair thing????? Even the king Democrat JFK knew that such high marginal tax rates killed the economy. Reducing the marginal tax rates to something more reasonable was the #1 reason our economy turned around. Even Clinton's tax increase to a 39% top marginal rate was a Reaganistic tax policy compared to the tax rates of the 70's. Reaganomics is alive and well was the single most important tax reform in our lifetimes which lead to the best economic times in our nation's history.

20 posted on 06/09/2004 7:04:13 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
Her friends predict that in the days to come, she will speak out with increasing frequency and determination on behalf of stem-cell research

Nancy Reagan is a patriot. Which is why she denied Clinton a chance to speak at the funeral. Which is why she denied Nancy Pelosi a place at the Capitol service. Which is why she will wait until AFTER the election to step up her campaign for stem cell research.

Mrs Reagan has spent too many decades by her husband's side fighting Communists to assist Stalin's heirs in the Democrat party from gaining power on November 6.

21 posted on 06/09/2004 7:04:21 AM PDT by montag813 ("A nation can survive fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
that the public tributes to the late Ronald Reagan this week will lift the sagging George W. Bush.

And the public will ignore Bush's huge victory in the UN this week?

These guys are scared stiff.

22 posted on 06/09/2004 7:04:53 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (NEOCON NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo

Let me put this more properly...

"While trying to avoid ostentatious gloating, Democrat operatives quietly confide their hope that the public tributes to the late Paul Wellstone this week will lift the sagging Al Gore."

Projection is always a pathetic ego defense mechanism.


26 posted on 06/09/2004 7:14:24 AM PDT by glaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo

They are pushing this stem-cell stuff with a passion. There was a HUGE article about it in the Atlanta paper this morning, the second one in just a few days. This comes from the same crowd that made Paul Wellstone's funeral into a pep rally. I guess it's only fitting that they do this sort of thing with funerals since their cause is the Culture of Death.


27 posted on 06/09/2004 7:18:31 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
...just the media TRYING to start a riff between Nancy Reagan and Bush; the libs desparately need to somehow distance Bush from the Reagan legacy...so they're trying to start something that isn't there.

Nothing to see here...let's move on....
29 posted on 06/09/2004 7:24:12 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
I have no doubt that Nancy Reagan will continue to push for support. That, however, does not mean that she will decide to become a Democrat or vote for Kerry to get it. She will try to persuade Pres. Bush, try to persuade cabinet members to persuade Pres. Bush, and try to persuade Congressman and Senators to persuade Pres. Bush. She will also vote to re-elect Pres. Bush.

Yes, she may take "drastic measures", whatever those might be, if she is ignored, but that won't happen this week or this month or this year.

TS

31 posted on 06/09/2004 7:39:00 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I have No Blog to speak of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
Years from now Reagan will still be one of the greatest presidents in history and conason will be...."who??".
32 posted on 06/09/2004 7:54:13 AM PDT by ILS21R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazzo
"... the President’s "faith-based" aversion to scientific progress(What?). She believes that embryonic stem-cell research may someday relieve the Alzheimer’s disease that destroyed Reagan’s mind, and in that conviction she possesses the kind of credibility that suffering can confer. (She wouldn’t be the first conservative to learn deeper compassion from a terrible personal ordeal.)" Joe Conason is a deceit-filled liberal elitist. He will never get it, that the President's faith constrains embracing the cannibalism liberals like Conason want this nation to rely upon for 'miraculous cures', none of which have even been remotely observed while adult stem cell cures are becoming more numerous and in many areas of medicine. Nancy Reagan is a liberal and her plea for embryonic stem cell exploitation is far from a pro-life position ... but then she never professed to be pro-life like her husband, President Reagan.
33 posted on 06/09/2004 8:02:21 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson