Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GovernmentShrinker
Furthermore, clothing manufacturers have been steadily increasing clothing sizes (both the actual sizes of labelled numerical sizes, and the output of clothing with larger labelled numerical sizes) for a number of years,

Actually, no. Ever buy vintage clothes? I'm a modern designer's 10 or 12, and if the garment is older than I am (that would be 35), I have to go up to 14 or 16.
14 posted on 06/09/2004 10:50:14 AM PDT by Xenalyte (It's not often you see Johnny Mathis in the wild.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Xenalyte

You just made my point. If what used to be labelled a 14-16 is now labelled a 10-12, then what used to be labelled a 10-12 was the size of current 6-8. If you wore a 10-12 in older sizing systems, and haven't gained weight, then the new 10-12s are too big for you. If those vintage 14-16s fit you, and modern 10-12s fit you, then modern 14-16s are too big for you, because they're BIGGER than old 14-16s.


30 posted on 06/09/2004 11:29:03 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson