Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: toddst
Agreed. One form of power that solves most problems (as pointed out in another post) is nuclear.

I am not for that. Far too messy and a very dirty bomb sitting on our soil. Better ways to go about it than nuclear.

25 posted on 06/10/2004 7:53:07 AM PDT by BJungNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: BJungNan
Better ways to go about it than nuclear

Not really. Coal or nuc are the only practical options, but what do you think are the "better ways?"

27 posted on 06/10/2004 7:57:22 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: BJungNan
I am not for that. Far too messy and a very dirty bomb sitting on our soil. Better ways to go about it than nuclear.

What is so messy about it? As far as it being a dirty bomb, practically the only way to breach containment short of a nuclear weapon would be a "bunker buster" bomb, and the terrorists are a little short on the military infrastructure to deliver one to the continental United States.

41 posted on 06/10/2004 10:07:08 AM PDT by hopespringseternal (People should be banned for sophistry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson