Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hewitt: Both Great and Right
The Weekly Standard ^ | June 10, 2004 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 06/11/2004 12:02:51 PM PDT by RWR8189

Why Ronald Reagan made a difference and what his detractors are really after.

"RONALD REAGAN was great because Ronald Reagan was right." So declared Gipper speechwriter Peter Robinson, author of How Ronald Reagan Changed My Life, on my radio program Monday. Robinson's right, too, of course. There have been many gifted orators whose cause was evil; many "communicators" who dealt in death. Reagan's greatness is anchored in his and his country's goodness. Reagan used the term "evil empire," and sent the intelligentsia into shock. Because he stood with the good, however, Reagan could use the language of absolutes and move public and world opinion as a result.

It may be the effect of seeing Reagan lionized by a grateful public--imagine how Joe Frazier feels when Ali gets the glory again and again-- but the Democratic party is becoming more unhinged by the day. Tuesday's dance of the distraught at the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing featuring John Ashcroft was a marvel. The Senate's leading eccentric, Pat Leahy, led off the meeting with a rambling series of wild charges and even wilder demands of justice for Jose Padilla and an abandonment of DoJ's tough approach to terror. Then, during the question and answer portion, Leahy, Ted Kennedy, Joe Biden, and Dick Durbin put a frenzied Democratic leadership on public display.

I imagine there are some noisy admirers of Leahy and the gang at Judiciary who pretend to be worried that America is descending into some sort of collective Abu Ghraib mentality, and celebrate the hyper-partisanship of the Kerry-Kennedy caucus.

Throughout this week of mourning, Reagan-haters have been calling my

Falk AdSolution

show to object that Reagan increased the deficit, and of course, to bring up Iran-Contra. Throwing pebbles at the battleship, as the saying goes, and I ask every one of them to contact a Pole or a Latvian or a Romanian and ask their opinion about Reagan. But, like their counterparts on the Democratic side of the Senate Judiciary Committee's embrace of Abu Ghraib, the anti-Reagans aren't really concerned with deficits or arms-for-hostages, they are concerned with attempting to diminish their domestic political adversary.

The Leahy-led attacks of Ashcroft, and the remnant of the anti-Reagan crowds of the '80s share much more in common: growing desperation that history's verdict is already in, and that they were on the wrong side. Meanwhile, the confidence of the folks who served first with Reagan, and now with Bush, grows.

The acclaim being given Ronald Reagan this week--the acknowledgment and admiration for his genuine greatness, which means his genuine rightness--confirms that the country remains home to vast numbers of serious people committed to traditional American ideals and the export of freedom.

Hugh Hewitt is the host of The Hugh Hewitt Show, a nationally syndicated radio talkshow, and a contributing writer to The Daily Standard. His new book, In, But Not Of, has just been published by Thomas Nelson.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christianlife; hewitt; hughhewitt; reagan; weeklystandard

1 posted on 06/11/2004 12:02:52 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

If I've said it once, I've said it a thousand times ... HUGH HEWITT ROCKS!


2 posted on 06/11/2004 12:19:42 PM PDT by The G Man (*** ADVERTISE HERE *** THIS SPACE FOR RENT ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Kerry's campaign has certainly been hurt by this, but it came from a very unintuitive direction: the media who have been pounding the drum on Iraq have suddenly been reminded of their similar behavior during the Reagan administration, and how unfair that turned out to be - Bernard Shaw and Wolf Blitzer admitted as much. The parallel between the hostility toward a Republican president then and their hostility toward a Republican president now is so unmistakable that Bush's people don't even need to point it out.

The Dems certainly sense it. The Abu Ghraib story is starting to stink like a week-old mackerel and the Reagan story is overshadowing it now, and without the help of the media drum-pounding it will continue to do so until November. They're afraid they've lost their scandal.

3 posted on 06/11/2004 12:28:45 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

Professor Hewitt bump.


4 posted on 06/11/2004 3:27:26 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; wagglebee; 1rudeboy; A.A. Cunningham; doug from upland; ALOHA RONNIE; DLfromthedesert; ...
Throughout this week of mourning, Reagan-haters have been calling my show to object that Reagan increased the deficit, and of course, to bring up Iran-Contra.

Throwing pebbles at the battleship, as the saying goes...

See also, from:

Flag From USS Ronald Reagan to Go to Nancy Reagan
NewsMax ^ | 6/11/04 | AP
Posted on 06/10/2004 7:19:47 PM PDT by wagglebee

SAN DIEGO - The American flag that flew over the USS Ronald Reagan when the former president died Saturday will be presented to Nancy Reagan during his burial service, the Navy said Thursday.

The flag is being delivered by Capt. James Symonds, commanding officer of the Navy's newest nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, which is in the south Atlantic.

Symonds, who traveled to Los Angeles on Thursday, will present the flag to Mrs. Reagan during the service Friday in Simi Valley at the presidential library.

Mrs. Reagan christened the ship in 2001, breaking a bottle of sparkling wine against its bow. The carrier was formally commissioned last July in Norfolk, Va...

-- snip --

To: wagglebee

Too cool to format

CLICK HERE for a LARGER image


8 posted on 06/10/2004 8:44:57 PM PDT by 1rudeboy

-- snip --

To: Floyd R Turbo

"CVN-76, USS RONALD REAGAN, undergoing sea trials, testing its counter-measure wash-down system. It doubles as part of the ship's fire suppression system and can be used in a bio-hazard battlefield to wash down the decks and limit spread of NBC agents."

11 posted on 06/11/2004 4:42:11 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread
.
.


www.HughHewitt.com
PING!

If you listen to Hugh Hewitt,
or read his WorldNetDaily articles,
or his commentary at the Weekly Standard,
then this PING list is for YOU!

Please post your comments, and BUMP!

(If you want OFF - or ON - my "Hugh Hewitt PING list" - please let me know)

5 posted on 06/11/2004 6:38:57 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog

.

RONNIE gave all = We have it all

http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=52519

.


6 posted on 06/11/2004 6:42:28 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE (Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE; CyberAnt
See also:

Carrier Reagan sails for S.D. home
The San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | 5/27/04 | Otto Kreisher
Posted on 05/27/2004 8:33:55 AM PDT by South40

WASHINGTON – The nation's newest and most powerful aircraft carrier today sails from Norfolk, Va., on a journey that will take a crew of nearly 3,000 and a name with great California significance – Ronald Reagan – to its home port in San Diego.

To get to its new home, the nuclear-powered carrier will travel more than 12,000 nautical miles, going around Cape Horn at the southern tip of South America, a place noted for violent weather.

"We expect some high winds and heavy seas," said Capt. James Symonds, commanding officer of the 97,000-ton, 1,092-foot-long warship. "But I think we can handle it."

Along the way, the Reagan and its crew will transition from spring into fall, then into winter before emerging into summer for the ship's scheduled arrival at North Island Naval Air Station about July 23...

CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread

7 posted on 06/11/2004 6:51:42 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189; Mia T; Jeff Head; Jim Robinson
The Leahy-led attacks of Ashcroft, and the remnant of the anti-Reagan crowds of the '80s share much more in common: growing desperation that history's verdict is already in, and that they were on the wrong side. Meanwhile, the confidence of the folks who served first with Reagan, and now with Bush, grows.

This is really what it is all about.

8 posted on 06/11/2004 9:12:03 PM PDT by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
The Leahy-led attacks of Ashcroft, and the remnant of the anti-Reagan crowds of the '80s share much more in common: growing desperation that history's verdict is already in, and that they were on the wrong side. Meanwhile, the confidence of the folks who served first with Reagan, and now with Bush, grows.

The acclaim being given Ronald Reagan this week--the acknowledgment and admiration for his genuine greatness, which means his genuine rightness--confirms that the country remains home to vast numbers of serious people committed to traditional American ideals and the export of freedom.

Yes. Pick up the ball, George W. Bush. November 2, 2004, win one for the Gipper !!


9 posted on 06/12/2004 5:03:03 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Call me the Will Rogers voter: I never met a Democrat I didn't like - to vote OUT OF POWER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson