Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peggy Noonan: The Ben Elliott Story (What I saw at the funeral)
Opinion Journal ^ | 06/14/04 | Peggy Noonan

Posted on 06/13/2004 9:04:38 PM PDT by Pokey78

What was the meaning of the past remarkable nine days? You cannot stop the American people from feeling what they feel and showing it. From the crowds at Simi Valley to the hordes at the Capitol to the men and women who stopped and got out of their cars on Highway 101 to salute as Reagan came home--that was America talking to America about who America is.

It was a magnificent teaching moment for the whole country but most of all for the young, who barely remembered Ronald Reagan or didn't remember him at all. This week they heard who he was. The old ones spoke, on all the networks and in all the newspapers, and by the end of the week it was clear that Ronald Reagan had suddenly entered the Lincoln pantheon. By Friday it was no longer a question, as it had been for years, whether he was one of our top 10 presidents. It was a question only whether he was in the very top five or six--up there with Lincoln and Washington. An agreement had been reached: the 20th century came down to FDR and RWR.

What is important now is that we continue to speak of the meaning of his leadership. Not bang away about what a great guy he was--there are a lot of great guys--but what huge things he did, not because he had an "ideology" but because he had a philosophy, a specific one that had specific meaning. He was the great 20th-century conservative of America. He applied his philosophy to the realities of the world he lived in. In doing so he changed those realities, and for the better. This is what we must pass on.

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: almeyer; andrewferguson; christopherbuckley; clarkjudge; danarohrabacher; davidgergen; deeppen; haircutboy; joshgilder; kenkhachigian; landonparvin; patbuchanan; peggynoonan; peggynoonanlist; peterrobinson; ronaldreagan; thehack; tonydolan; tonysnow; whoareyou; whoareyouwhowho; whoisandyferguson; whoisdanarohrabacher; whoisdarkman; whoisdeepthroat; whoishaircutboy; whoishortonhearsawho; whoisjohngalt; whoispatbuchanan; whoispeterrobinson; whoisthehack; whoistheleprechaun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-237 next last
To: Pokey78

Peggy makes an enemy at the end. Actually, she cements an enemy. I pity the fool.


121 posted on 06/14/2004 4:59:04 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arjay

Dammit! I was going to use that for a tagline, but you beat me to it.


122 posted on 06/14/2004 5:10:53 AM PDT by snopercod (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." --Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Most excellent article, as always; thanks for the ping, pokey!


123 posted on 06/14/2004 5:14:36 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

And to be fair...I think that Mark Steyn borrowed the sentiment if not the line for Ronald Reagan.


124 posted on 06/14/2004 5:23:38 AM PDT by carton253 (Re: The Reagan Presidency: Not bad. Not bad at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AQGeiger

There was a Tony Dolan and a Ken Khachigian who were Reagan speechwriters. Other than Peggy Noonan, Ben Elliot, and Peter Robinson, that's all I can find.


125 posted on 06/14/2004 5:30:06 AM PDT by snopercod (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." --Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: beckett

Rohrbacher was almost pro-Saddam in the run-up to war. I hadn't been exposed to him then and I was like, who is this RINO?


126 posted on 06/14/2004 5:33:33 AM PDT by johnb838 (When I hear "Allahu Akhbar" it means somebody is about to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: beckett

I will grant you this -- the column was quite long. Some of it could easily have been trimmed. The part about the other speechwriters remind me of things I have written in posts here that when I'm reviewing it decide that they are better off left on the cutting room floor. Still, that she decided to leave it means she cared about it very deeply.

The column was titled The Ben Elliot Story, so this was central to the theme. I think that since she was writing about the death by a thousand cuts suffered by this guy she considered a mentor, smacking back at the hacks in the Reagan WH also must have been central. Perhaps not for her, but for Ben.


127 posted on 06/14/2004 5:38:59 AM PDT by johnb838 (When I hear "Allahu Akhbar" it means somebody is about to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: carton253; sinkspur; ikka; A Citizen Reporter; Ruth A.
And to be fair...I think that Mark Steyn borrowed the sentiment if not the line for Ronald Reagan.

Right you are. As far as I know its first appearance came in Reagan's 1981 Inaugural, although it could've been a carryover from a previous speech. See Paragraph 13:

So, as we begin, let us take inventory. We are a nation that has a government—not the other way around. And this makes us special among the nations of the Earth. Our Government has no power except that granted it by the people. It is time to check and reverse the growth of government which shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the governed.

My favorite passage is three paragraphs up (Para. 10):

From time to time, we have been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. But if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else?

128 posted on 06/14/2004 5:42:57 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy; paulat

Some scores in Washington need settling, and it is appropriate to settle scores with guys who are still in public life. If these guys are trading on their relationship with Ronald Regan and a frauds then they deserve to be outed to protect his legacy.


129 posted on 06/14/2004 5:49:31 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: paulat

I agree- I was loving the stories about Reagan and those that knew him and then that last part. Tacky.


130 posted on 06/14/2004 5:50:20 AM PDT by lawgirl (God to womankind: "Here's Cary Grant. Now don't tell me I never gave you anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Peggy Noonan, what a lady!


131 posted on 06/14/2004 5:51:53 AM PDT by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

*Save & file* bump


132 posted on 06/14/2004 5:53:49 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas (Rest in Peace, President Reagan. **Greatest President of the 20th Century**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olinr; Victoria Delsoul

great article.


133 posted on 06/14/2004 5:56:50 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Benjamin Dover
She exudes class.

Not this time. Taking public shots at former colleagues is extremely low rent.

134 posted on 06/14/2004 6:06:39 AM PDT by M. Thatcher (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

the hack and the haircut guy... pictured together in a later post...

what is a hack but a non-native going to new york to make a living and possibly scoring big...

t

jmho and i didn't read the article...


135 posted on 06/14/2004 6:07:58 AM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Here's one of the things I saw at the funeral: A smirking scumbag.

I must be experiencing double vision - I see two.

136 posted on 06/14/2004 6:26:00 AM PDT by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

No it was from Reagan himself. The word nation was used rather than country.


137 posted on 06/14/2004 6:32:08 AM PDT by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nana4bush

There are several pictures of Reagan with Rohrbacher on the congressman's web site. Are these the pictures being touted on TV? http://www.house.gov/rohrabacher/


138 posted on 06/14/2004 6:35:13 AM PDT by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ikka

>>>
No, Reagan used this in one of his speeches during the 80s, or even before.
<<<

Of course, Peggy Noonan could have written it for Reagan in the first place.


139 posted on 06/14/2004 6:49:56 AM PDT by evilC (I take some of the blame, for many years I was a Democrat - Ronald Reagan (1911 - 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
A clue on "The Hack" was she says he hadn't written a book but has appeared on tv boasting of his relationship to Ronald Reagan and displaying a picture to prove it.

Hmmmmmmmmmm

Isn't gossip vicious! ...and fun. Just between you and me, I would take a guess at Ken Khachigian as the Hack, he is a former Nixon and Reagan speechwriter who is essentially a political consultant in California. From what I have seen of him, he appears inarticulate [see his October 03 interview with Brit Hume on the Arnold sex disclosures by the LA Times--google his name and it will come up fairly quickly] and greasy. But I really don't know. I only say this as names that could be ruled out or in with further info.

And though I have only heard good things about Peter Robinson who is credited with "tear down this wall" speech, he may be the haircut. He did write two books, How RR changed my life" and another about his struggles in the GOP. I haven't read either one, but if Peggy felt that he should have given credit to Bently when talking about how RR changed his life, that may be it. Also he was a speechwriter from 82 to 88. The only rule out clue is that the Berlin Wall speech was in 87 not 88, so it may not be him, or else she is giving [mildly] disinformational clues. Who knows?

Boy, that was a zinger about the Hack. I guess Peggy is not inviting him to her next party.

140 posted on 06/14/2004 6:51:45 AM PDT by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson