Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: swarthyguy

Before The Patriot Act came into effect. Law enforcement could go after the mob but were not able to go after terrorist. Now they can. Of course you have to get a search warrant before you do all this. Wouldn't it be nice to catch a child molestor this way!? With a search warrant of course.


18 posted on 06/14/2004 1:53:51 PM PDT by Milligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Milligan

how about catching a thief who steals my hard earned money? Or a thug who beats up old women?
Where do you draw the line? Why not have a police state so we all can be "safe"?


22 posted on 06/14/2004 2:00:11 PM PDT by I_killed_kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Milligan
Before The Patriot Act came into effect. Law enforcement could go after the mob but were not able to go after terrorist.

Excellent example.

The law passed to fight organized crime was the RICO act. It was broad in scope but its proponets said it was sorely needed and would only to be used against mob bosses.

It was later used against abortion protesters (SURPRISE!), and today is routinely used against suspects that have nothing to do with organized crime. RICO is rivaled only by seatbelt laws as the clearest textbook case example of mission creep and incrementalism.

And now the RICO act is being used as an example of why government should have yet more power?

23 posted on 06/14/2004 2:00:21 PM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson