Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official: Hiding Prisoner From Red Cross Was Legal
FoxNews ^ | 6/16/04 | FoxNews

Posted on 06/16/2004 7:33:22 PM PDT by wagglebee

A "high-value" detainee was hidden from Red Cross inspectors in Iraq on the orders of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (search), U.S. officials told Fox News.

The prisoner's situation, as first reported by U.S. News and World Report on Monday, was described as the result of a directive issued from the top American commander in Iraq, Gen. Ricardo Sanchez (search). However, the order to hide the detainee, described by officials as a terrorist, seems to have come from as high up as the Pentagon, Fox News has learned.

The 800th Military Police Brigade, which has been under heightened scrutiny since the Iraqi prisoner abuse scandal first broke, was instructed to keep the detainee, referred to as "Prisoner XXX," out of sight of the International Committee of the Red Cross (search).

"XXX" was held in U.S. custody but not issued an "INS" number used by the coalition and the ICRC for tracking prisoners in Iraq, senior Defense officials said. "XXX" was also isolated and heavily guarded at the High Value Detention facility Camp Cropper near the Baghdad airport beginning last November, according to U.S. News.

The detainee's presence was kept so secret, in fact, that the military may have even lost track of him at times.

Officials said "XXX" was a senior member of the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Islam. After his capture, intelligence and military officers quickly determined he was valuable as an information source.

"He knew Ansar al-Islam's leadership structure, he knew their training techniques and he knew the locations of their camps and some of their operatives," one official said.

U.S. officials disputed any accusations that the military's handling of "XXX" was illegal, stating that a detainee who represents a direct threat to coalition forces does not have to be registered with the ICRC "right away."

"The Geneva Convention does not require that someone like this be immediately registered," one official said. "This guy was involved in terrorist activity in Iraq, and was involved in planning attacks on coalition forces."

But since the release earlier this month of confidential memos in which Justice Department lawyers argued Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters did not merit Geneva protections, the Bush Administration has stepped away from those assertions.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; icrc; iraq; redcross
I for one am way beyond caring about any supposed rights that a terrorist who wants to destroy America may or may not have. If it was up to me most of the Middle East would have been about 20000 degrees on September 12, 2001.
1 posted on 06/16/2004 7:33:26 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The military may have suspected that the rep from American Red Cross-Red Crescent would report back to our enemies who was being held, and where.


2 posted on 06/16/2004 7:43:20 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Uh-oh.


3 posted on 06/16/2004 7:48:31 PM PDT by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
News Flash to Red Cross:
You are not in charge!
So shut up.

4 posted on 06/16/2004 7:53:24 PM PDT by Libertina (Reagan showed us what being a great president was all about. Thank you sir for bringing pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
The ICRC would be required to publish a list of detainees presented to them. So of course it would get out if they knew.

The bad guys see his name, know what he knows, changes those things. Codes, safe houses, etc.

The guy is a security detainee under the Fourth Geneva Convention, and there is a specific provision for not allowing the ICRC or other groups not to see prisoners for security.

5 posted on 06/16/2004 7:54:50 PM PDT by blaster88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
IMO releasing the identity of a captured terrorist leader would be prima facie grounds for impeachment, removal, or court martial if it harmed our ability to make operational use of the capture.

Terrorists have no rights under the laws of war.

We support the Red Cross to save lives- not to sacrifice them.

6 posted on 06/16/2004 7:58:23 PM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"All Your Ansar al-Islam Leadership Structure Now Belong To Us!"
7 posted on 06/16/2004 8:00:20 PM PDT by JOE6PAK ("The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

You may be close to the real story - I was thinking that this guy might have been of such high value that keeping his capture secret for the time was more important... That in combination with the very real possibility of a mole in the Red Cross/ Red Crescent makes for a very legitimate reason to keep the guy under wraps.


8 posted on 06/16/2004 8:02:42 PM PDT by TheBattman (Leadership = http://www.georgewbush.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

From your lips to God's ears, please.......


9 posted on 06/16/2004 8:20:34 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

A simple question: how many 'detained individuals' (of whatever nationality) have the iraqis let the ICRC interview?


10 posted on 06/16/2004 9:07:15 PM PDT by solitas ("HA HA!" (Nelson Muntz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
As the Red Cross and their brother Organization the Red Crescent are actively supporting Terrorists in Israel, the Red Cross IS a terrorist group. Why would we give them any political respect in Iraq if they do not deserve it elsewhere?

The murder and terrorist across the border but respected diplomat when it is against us garbage does not fly.

Kinda like the ALCU suing to remove freedom from Christians everywhere. You can call a pig a bird, but it never does fly.
11 posted on 06/16/2004 9:30:36 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson