To: datura
I still don't understand why anyone on this planet gives... Well his last two books were best sellers and maybe here comes a third. Pat is one great original thinking writer and an accomplished 'conservative' American.
Pat is usually 100% on the mark and sometimes 10%. Either way, there would be no pro and con without Pat.
But the 'Catholic Bashers' won't let Pat alone. Pat dislikes some policies even if they are backed by the 'corner'. When he does, then here comes the 'antisemite charges'.
I'll reserve judgement until the book comes out.
52 posted on
06/17/2004 6:57:21 AM PDT by
duckln
To: duckln
We are not 'Catholic Bashers'.
Nazi bashers? Yes.
Catholic... no.
Pat admired the 'little general'.
... nuff said.
84 posted on
06/17/2004 9:14:28 AM PDT by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
To: duckln
So Jews are Catholic bashers?
I've defended Pat. I've debated for Pat. I voted for Pat. However, the guy flirts with anti-Semetism quite often.
His defense of Ivan Demjanjuk (who, while not Ivan the Terrible, was a guard.) included a clame that diesel was not used to kill Jews.
150 posted on
06/17/2004 11:40:42 AM PDT by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: duckln
Pat is one great original thinking writerAccording to lispers everywhere
166 posted on
06/17/2004 5:00:14 PM PDT by
NYC GOP Chick
(Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! -- RIP, President Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson