Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: familyofman

Cliff notes version (hah!):

1. The Clinton administration repeatedly mentioned the relationship between OBL and Saddam.

2. The Clinton administration's justice department in federal court indicted OBL in 1998 and mentioned his relationship with Saddam.

3. The press wrote 100's of articles in the 90's about the world's alarm at the growing relationship between OBL and Iraq. Newsweek and the NYT are among the mainstream press who wrote about this extensively.

4. 9/11 families have won a verdict in federal court blaming IRAQ for 9/11.

5. Saddam knew 9/11 was coming and mentioned in his state run newspaper in July 2001 that OBL was going to hit the US and we'd never sing New York, New York again without crying.

6. Hundreds of other links but they aren't in Cliff Note version.


34 posted on 06/17/2004 9:28:09 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Peach

"Cliff notes version (hah!):"

Thank you, now even those of us with short attention spans and ingrained aversion to reading long lists know your salient points (I did before anyhow).:)


37 posted on 06/17/2004 9:37:02 AM PDT by familyofman (out of the night when the full moon is bright comes a horseman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Peach; Grampa Dave; STARWISE; justshutupandtakeit; Lancey Howard; Howlin; xzins; maica; Cosmo; ...
As you can tell I'm busy reviewing lots of threads from the past few years, checking out articles and posts for details that may seem newly relevant as the ABLE DANGER story unfolds. I believe that many aspects of the 9/11 plot, and especially the mendacious failures of the 9/11 O-mission, will become evident now to millions of people, and it is important to get ahold of all the information that has come out over the past few years that the media and the O-missioners neglected, distorted, and/or lied about.

One thing that jumps out at me from this outstanding article by Andrew McCarthy is the following:

"[the Commission]....does not mention, let alone explain, let alone explain away, that al Midhar was escorted to the meeting by Ahmed Hikmat Shakir."

This Malaysia meeting pre-9/11 and the role of Ahmed Hikmat Shakir is HUGE, because there is no question the meeting took place or that some of the 9/11 hijackers were present, and no one can seriously question that Shakir was an Iraqi intel/Fedayeen agent, as evidenced by later details when he was arrested in Jordan.....

The media and the supposed experts are seriously derelict in not holding the 9/11 Commission to the fire over Shakir -- I can see no plausible explanation at all except that he was an Iraqi intel agent meeting with 9/11 terrorists.....
90 posted on 08/24/2005 8:37:37 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson