Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Strikes Deal With Local Iraq Leader
The Las Vegas Sun ^ | June 20, 2004 at 12:47:01 PDT | FISNIK ABRASHI

Posted on 06/20/2004 1:48:09 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

BAQOUBA, Iraq (AP) -

The U.S. military handed security responsibility back to local leaders in the nearby town of Buhriz on Sunday after hammering Sunni Muslim insurgents in three days of clashes that killed 19 militants and one U.S. soldier.

The deal calls for American troops to pull back, and for Iraqi police to step in and establish security in the town of 40,000, U.S. military officials said.

Similar arrangements have been reached in Najaf, Fallujah and elsewhere in Iraq where the Americans have stepped aside and allowed Iraqi forces to assume greater security roles after clashes with insurgents.

That could become the pattern across much of the country as the U.S.-run coalition hands over sovereignty to an interim Iraqi government June 30.

"Our goal here in 10 days will be the full sovereignty here in Iraq," said Col. Dana J.H. Pittard, the commander of the 3rd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division. "If we cannot trust the police for maintaining control of order, then who can I trust?"

Under the plan, local security forces will conduct patrols and keep insurgents at bay while the Americans will hang back and conduct only sporadic patrols. The Americans reserved the right to return in force should their patrols be fired upon, Pittard said.

The deal was struck after hours of talks in the nearby city of Baqouba, 35 miles northeast of the capital, Baghdad.

"We have been given guarantees by the chief of police and the local leaders that they will maintain order and we will respect that," Pittard told reporters at a news conference to announce the deal.

The clashes in Buhriz began Wednesday when insurgents fired on U.S. troops after they had wrapped up a meeting with the mayor to discuss reconstruction projects. Two days of intense fighting that followed killed at least 19 insurgents and one U.S. soldier, Pittard said.

Gen. Walid Abdul-Salaam, chief of police for the Diyala province, said 13 civilians were killed and 34 wounded. Casualty tolls are difficult to determine, as fighters fearing arrest by U.S. authorities often do not take their wounded or dead to local hospitals.

Pittard accused Saddam Hussein's sympathizers of leading the insurgency in the area.

"The vast majority of the insurgents are the former regime elements," he said.

But he added that members of the Jordanian-born militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's network are known to be operating in the area.

"Diyala is like a way station to his network," Pittard said.

Al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian-born terrorist with suspected links to al-Qaida, is believed to be operating in Iraq and masterminding a series of car bomb attacks that have targeted security forces in the weeks before the handover.

The American military launched a strike Sunday against what U.S. officials said was a suspected safehouse for the Jordanian-born militant's group in the southern city of Fallujah. At least 16 people were killed in the strike.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baqouba; iraq

1 posted on 06/20/2004 1:48:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Will Iraqization of security work?
It has to.
2 posted on 06/20/2004 1:51:07 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This sure as heck didn't work in Fallujah, where Saddamite terrorists now have a safe haven to conduct attacks against our troops.

The problem in Fallujah, and probably this place now, is that we have no hold on the people that take over after our forces leave, so they find it easy to work with the resistance.

I advocate taking the families of these people hostage in order to ensure their loyalty. That is an ancient custom that has worked well in many times and places and would work well here, too, but I guess we're too nice for that.

We can't afford to be nice.

3 posted on 06/20/2004 2:12:17 PM PDT by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Do you see what they are doing Ernest? We go in with all guns blazing, then the local IP step forward to ask us to stop and say they'll take care of it. We then stop and let them. It creates a feeling of gratitude from the people toward the IP, and a feeling of fear that if the IP can't do it the US will come back with their big guns and bombs.

That keeps the locals from joining up with the bad guys. Very, very clever.

4 posted on 06/20/2004 2:34:50 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

It's working far better in Fallujah than you realize. The bad guys are running rampant now and the town, that was full of hostile Saddamites are now wishing we'd come back in and get rid of them. When the time is right, we, along with the IP will go back in and the people will be grateful instead of joining in with the terrorists.


5 posted on 06/20/2004 2:37:12 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

You're right, very clever.


6 posted on 06/20/2004 3:11:55 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Indeed. It's classic good cop - bad cop; moreover, it gets the locals policing themselves rather than having us babysit them forever.
7 posted on 06/20/2004 3:16:59 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
You say the bad guys are running rampant and that is good news to you? I hate to break it to you, We're not going back in there.

We got some Baathist general in there and who knows what he's up to? No good, that's what. We should have taken his family for their "safe keeping". Then I guarantee you things would be more quiet. This guy would be falling all over himself to help us, instead of working hand in glove with our enemies.

8 posted on 06/20/2004 5:02:49 PM PDT by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson