Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Economic signs aren't encouraging
New York Newsday ^ | June 21, 2004 | ANDREW ZIMBALIST

Posted on 06/21/2004 7:27:00 AM PDT by presidio9

Edited on 06/21/2004 7:30:44 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

As President George W. Bush tries to persuade the nation that he has a plan for Iraq, he might try another tough sell: that he has a plan for the economy. While the U.S. economy continues to limp along with the unemployment rate at 5.6 percent, its vital signs are not encouraging.

The unemployment rate itself is up from 4 percent in 2000. But the official rate only includes those who are actively looking for work, and therefore excludes the nearly half million discouraged workers who have stopped looking. It also leaves out another 4.4 million who are working part time involuntarily. Nor does it tell us that the rate among Latinos is 7 percent or among blacks it is 9.9 percent.

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan has done all he could with monetary policy to keep the U.S. economy from falling into a second recession since 2001. The target federal funds rate has been below 1.25 percent for the last 18 months and below 2 percent since the end of 2001 (down from 6 percent at the beginning of 2001). The federal funds rate has not been this low for this long since before World War II.

Look for rates to begin to climb when the Federal Open Market Committee next meets on June 29-30. The real question is not whether interest rates will rise, but rather how rapidly and how far they will go. Rising rates will slow the already sluggish economy.

Together with war spending and oil problems, Greenspan's expansionary monetary policy now has the economy poised for a new bout of inflation. During the first five months of 2004, the consumer price index rose at an annual rate of 5.1 percent - that's after being up 1.9 percent for all of 2003 and 1.3 percent for all of 2002. Also worrisome, falling unit labor costs were helping to retard inflationary pressures, but they have begun to increase in recent quarters.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: liberalswill; panic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Andrew Zimbalist is a professor of economics at Smith College.


1 posted on 06/21/2004 7:27:01 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Economic signs aren't encouraging"

Yeah, if your name is John Kerry.

2 posted on 06/21/2004 7:29:10 AM PDT by hometoroost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Andrew Zimbalist sounds like Kim Jong Il. Deny reality, deny reality, deny reality (repeat as often as politically necessary).


3 posted on 06/21/2004 7:29:31 AM PDT by Maynerd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Me think him make sense."

~ Bizarro

4 posted on 06/21/2004 7:32:36 AM PDT by The G Man (*** THIS SPACE FOR RENT ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I wouldn't want to swap unemployment statistics with Germany or France.


5 posted on 06/21/2004 7:32:59 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I cannot believe that people are still honestly writing this stuff. Is there no such thing as journalistic integrity? This sounds like Baghdad Bob saying that there are no US troops in the country as the army was entering Baghdad.

This completely ignores every positive sign the economy has been showing. It points out that the unemployment rate does not include discouraged workers, while ignoring the fact that it never has. It over-exaggerates the inflation risk. It implies that rising taxes will help lower the unemployment rate without any support. It ignores the effect of higher productivity on inflation and the ability to leave interest rates low due to productivity.

This is a joke.


6 posted on 06/21/2004 7:33:02 AM PDT by Marfoe (http://www.marfoeblog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Andy, here, is writing for a paper that just got caught inflating its circulation figures to screw advertisers out of higher rates. It is very good to see that the same level of journalistic integrity extends to all aspects of this organization.


7 posted on 06/21/2004 7:34:22 AM PDT by Tacis (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Was this marxist, lie-filled opinion piece on the op-ed page or did they characterize it as an economic report?


8 posted on 06/21/2004 7:34:32 AM PDT by VRWCmember (Mais Oui! "Kerry" est le mot francais pour "Dukakis"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

They put up their wall of lies every step of the way, eh?


9 posted on 06/21/2004 7:34:46 AM PDT by Paul_B (The day, Today, presents opportunities which we will never see again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marfoe
Is there no such thing as journalistic integrity?

That was a rhetorical question, right? :)

10 posted on 06/21/2004 7:35:15 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
While the U.S. economy continues to limp along with the unemployment rate at 5.6 percent,

I believe the economist John Maynard Keynes, the darling of the Left, defined full employment as an unemployment rate of 8%.

Nice to see they are altering reality when it so suits them.

Regards, Ivan

11 posted on 06/21/2004 7:35:17 AM PDT by MadIvan (Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can indeed change the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Wasn't he the star of The F.B.I.? He was great in that show.

It was brought to you "In Color" too. Wow.


12 posted on 06/21/2004 7:35:32 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maynerd
The unemployment rate itself is up from 4 percent in 2000. But the official rate only includes those who are actively looking for work, and therefore excludes the nearly half million discouraged workers who have stopped looking.

I love it when liberals bring up this point as if it had any significance. Unemployment has always been measured this way. In 2000, there were many millions of people out of work who were not actively looking. There always are, and they always will be. Most of them are called "housewives."

13 posted on 06/21/2004 7:35:58 AM PDT by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

It's on the opinion page.


14 posted on 06/21/2004 7:36:03 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (John F-ing Kerry??? NO... F-ING... WAY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

"journalistic integrity" = oxy-moronic statement


15 posted on 06/21/2004 7:36:59 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Marfoe
Newsday Says Its Circulation Was Inflated.
16 posted on 06/21/2004 7:37:11 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

There is no recovery! All the leading economic indicators are bad! The economy is not growing, no jobs have been created, and inflation is wiping out all your savings.
17 posted on 06/21/2004 7:38:02 AM PDT by VRWCmember (Mais Oui! "Kerry" est le mot francais pour "Dukakis"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marfoe

The only thing that would make professor Zimbalist happier than a major market crash this summer is a horrific terrorist attack on our forces in Iraq.


18 posted on 06/21/2004 7:39:00 AM PDT by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This guy studies at the feet of Paul Krugman.


19 posted on 06/21/2004 7:40:34 AM PDT by Aeronaut (I think I'll just go lie by my dish and whimper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"Andrew Zimbalist is a professor of economics at Smith College. "

If so, every parent should demand a refund from Smith College.

Short of socialism, or communism, you won't see a unemployment rate much below 5.6 in this nation.

I'm constantly amazed at the lunacy concerning the economy and business in general that comes from the Ivory Tower of Academia.

Tenure is the most damaging concept ever created in higher education. It guarantees mediocrity.


20 posted on 06/21/2004 7:41:22 AM PDT by Badeye ("The day you stop learning, is the day you begin dying")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson