Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. at War With Beijing, Reports Cite China as No. 1 Threat
newsmax.com ^ | June 17, 2004 | Charles R. Smith

Posted on 06/21/2004 12:55:23 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-188 next last
To: neutrino; hchutch; John H K
So you're suggesting that the U.S. Navy is going to blockade China?

If there's a ChiCom attempt to invade Taiwan?

Yes, absolutely. We're going to be involved from the get-go in such a war.

The alternative is that the Taiwanese had better win unassisted. That's because if the Taiwanese lose, they will use their nuclear arsenal on China as a last statement of Dew neh loh moh to the world.

101 posted on 06/21/2004 7:14:32 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Missile shield will be up and running


102 posted on 06/21/2004 7:14:50 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

It's probably easier for us to build NMD against China, and maintain pace with the ChiCom nuclear force structure, than it ever was against the Russians.


103 posted on 06/21/2004 7:15:49 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen

We would be able to start bringing the manufacturing back home again; bring all the tech stuff to Silicon valley etc.


104 posted on 06/21/2004 7:16:29 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
megatherium: She could not understand why China (the mainland) shouldn't have the right to control Taiwan, nor could she understand why the West had any business interfering in the matter.

Alberta's Child: I tend to agree with her. Did she also suggest that the U.S. had no business chasing the Japanese out of Manchuria in the 1930s?

I'm afraid I didn't ask her that. But it really impressed me, how nationalistic to China she was even though she was Canadian. (She was a graduate student in molecular biology I met while visiting the University of Minnesota.) If her attitude is typical, we've got a real problem considering our treaty obligations to Taiwan.

105 posted on 06/21/2004 7:17:17 PM PDT by megatherium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

They aren't ready yet, but they are a massive country. We are like a little bug.

Just thank goodness we have Dubya, who will actually continue to advance our weapons so China's will continue to be inferior.

Another 8 years of a Clinton type would have kept our weapons pretty stagnant as the Chinese advanced rapidly.


106 posted on 06/21/2004 7:28:52 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
The worse news is that even if we tried to stop (let alone reverse) the process, we're in bad shape -- really bad shape. The brainpower necessary to man the infrastructure has largely gone to retirement, to the grave, or offshore.

That's a fact, and there are fewer young Americans getting graduate degrees in science, per the National Science Foundation. We aren't filling the pipeline for the future.

There is a further problem. China can either liquidate our debt on the open market, or merely quit purchasing our bonds and T-Bills. The net result will be a disruption of the markets and an increase in interest rates. Without firing a shot, they can hurt our economy.

I think we will pay a heavy price for those cheap goods.

107 posted on 06/21/2004 7:36:11 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Yes, absolutely. We're going to be involved from the get-go in such a war.

Um-hmm. And if that's true, what happens to the billions of dollars of U.S. investment in China? What happens to our economy when we can't manufacture the things our military require?

Can you say consequences?

108 posted on 06/21/2004 7:39:25 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
"Mr. Lenin, please buy this rope."

Or even, "Mr. Lenin, please buy this rope. I've arranged a nothing down, E-Z payment plan for you!"

109 posted on 06/21/2004 7:41:07 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
Really? Like at Tiananmen Square?

After the COSCO ships return to port with the food that was originally destined for us, China won't have all that much trouble feeding their own.

110 posted on 06/21/2004 7:41:54 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Your entire scenario is based on a starving chinese population. I don't see it.

Bingo. China has been putting American farmers out of business for the past several years, and it hasn't been only so they could "make money selling us food."

When they turn the COSCO ships around, that food will go to domestic consumption, and we, meanwhile, will be looking at starting from scratch, with no lead time.

Advantage China.

111 posted on 06/21/2004 7:46:42 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
what happens to the billions of dollars of U.S. investment in China? What happens to our economy when we can't manufacture the things our military require?

What will happen is that China will sit back and say, "Isn't it great when a PLAN comes together?"

112 posted on 06/21/2004 7:49:08 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
After the COSCO ships return to port with the food that was originally destined for us, China won't have all that much trouble feeding their own.

I suspect they'll do a much better job of coping with food shortages than we will. Can you imagine the wailing that will occur if WalMart runs short on the free-traitors' favorite TV snack?

Some years ago, we had a minor snow storm here. It couldn't have been more than five or six inches of snow, and it was all gone in 48 hours - but by the end of the first evening, the grocery store shelves were bare. This in a city of more than a million!

I think we are very vulnerable to any supply disruption, and I question our fortitude in dealing with such situations.

113 posted on 06/21/2004 7:49:33 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
What will happen is that China will sit back and say, "Isn't it great when a PLAN comes together?"

Speaking of plans - I cannot help wondering if Iran is serving as China's pawn presently. Why do they seem to be spoiling for a fight? Why did they seize the British patrol boats? It could be Mullah madness, of course...but I cannot help wondering if Beijing isn't encouraging it.

114 posted on 06/21/2004 7:53:16 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
That's a fact, and there are fewer young Americans getting graduate degrees in science, per the National Science Foundation. We aren't filling the pipeline for the future.

And the reason is simple: Supply and demand. There isn't any pipeline for the future, so why prepare to fill it?

There is a further problem. China can either liquidate our debt on the open market, or merely quit purchasing our bonds and T-Bills. The net result will be a disruption of the markets and an increase in interest rates. Without firing a shot, they can hurt our economy.

We're balanced on such a razor's edge in so many areas that it would take but a puff for them to blow us over. And they know it. And they plan it. And they make no secret of it. It's only our self-imposed delusions that motivate us to ignore it, to our own peril.

I think we will pay a heavy price for those cheap goods.

Heavier than this world has ever seen. It wouldn't take much to make "The Postman" seem like a walk in the park.

115 posted on 06/21/2004 7:56:31 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
I suspect they'll do a much better job of coping with food shortages than we will. Can you imagine the wailing that will occur if WalMart runs short on the free-traitors' favorite TV snack?

Some years ago, we had a minor snow storm here. It couldn't have been more than five or six inches of snow, and it was all gone in 48 hours - but by the end of the first evening, the grocery store shelves were bare. This in a city of more than a million!

I think we are very vulnerable to any supply disruption, and I question our fortitude in dealing with such situations.

Sadly, you're right on the money for the most part. The average Chinese will cope fairly well with a diet of rice and beans, because it won't really be much of a transition at all. The average American, on the other hand, is really screwed when it comes to the "living with adversity" department.

Rice, wheat, and beans are really cheap. And they store well, without much difficulty. I'll be able to survive for a year or so, living like a Chinaman, until I can (hopefully) get some crops in, to see us through to the next year. I'd be way ahead of the game if not for resistance from my wife. :(

116 posted on 06/21/2004 8:00:53 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
I cannot help wondering if Iran is serving as China's pawn presently.

Possibly. Possibly without realizing it, too.

Why do they seem to be spoiling for a fight?

It's their nature. Islamists, like communists, are obsessed with the idea of ruling the world.

Why did they seize the British patrol boats?

For that matter, why has there been pretty much of a news blackout on it? An act of war by Iran against the UK should be THE news of the day, but it ain't. I can't shake the idea that TPTB have put out the word to the compliant "free" press to keep a lid on it.

We've gone from Roosevelt's Big Stick aimed at Raisuli to the modern "don't rock the boat" neochamberlainism.

117 posted on 06/21/2004 8:05:40 PM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

that missile shield will probably contain a ship mounted contingent. Mobil and hooked into the main satalite system. If the barrage of missiles happens and we can take out a large number of them, we can seriously screw up the plans to land a force of 245,000. At least it will buy time. They will not be able to mobilize that many troups without use seeing it. ( hopefully)


118 posted on 06/21/2004 8:29:18 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"I didn't realize that Taiwan was the only place in the world to get those components. The things you learn on FR..."

Oh, of course there are other places. But Taiwan is the main supplier. I believe something like 60% of all PC parts for sale today come from Taiwan. The loss of a supply that large WILL have repercussions, and new sources of high technology do not spring up overnight.

I didn't realize people were this aloof about the economy. The things you learn on FR...
119 posted on 06/21/2004 8:36:17 PM PDT by Terpfen (Re-elect Bush; kill terrorists now, fix Medicare later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
"We would be able to start bringing the manufacturing back home again; bring all the tech stuff to Silicon valley etc."

Easier said than done. It takes a while and a lot of money to get things going. We could do it, sure, but there's no working around the logistics. I'd rather keep the Chicomms off Taiwan in the first place.
120 posted on 06/21/2004 8:40:24 PM PDT by Terpfen (Re-elect Bush; kill terrorists now, fix Medicare later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson