Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

"And a Kerry presidency will just warm the cockles of your heart,I bet. :-)"

Not at all, but congress does tend to spend less with a democrat holding the presidency. I hate Kerry more than Bush, but I wouldn't vote for either of them for president.


62 posted on 06/21/2004 7:04:57 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: monday
Not at all, but congress does tend to spend less with a democrat holding the presidency.

And a democrat as president has a tendency to sell military secrets to the chicoms and do nothing about the spread of islamofascism(i.e clinton).

I surmise you have the warm and fuzzies about those actions by clinton and the demos.

65 posted on 06/21/2004 7:08:51 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: monday
Still more political naifery!

There is NO guarantee that both House will remain in the hands of the GOP and the slimmest of slim majority the GOP holds in the Senate,is smoke and mirrors at best.

By voting for a fringe candidate for president,in the hopes that both Houses would keep a Kerry presidency in check,is palpably foolish and delusional!

Clinton got away with LOTS,even when the GOPers were pressing him with welfare reform and balanced budgets.Kerry wouldn't be any different!And to assume that your daydreams would be better than a second term of President Bush,is silly and detrimental to all of us.

Just thank GOD,that there are enough of us out here,working to re-elect President Bush,to save your sorry rears.

87 posted on 06/21/2004 7:24:02 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson