To: JohnHuang2
I could have sworn that this was an Onion article when I first started reading it. Please somebody tell me that this isn't for real.
The Conspiracy nuts will have a field day with this one. And they may not be so crazy when doing so!
17 posted on
06/21/2004 10:28:19 PM PDT by
bluefish
(Disclaimer for Pukin: I do not believe Freepers should die for arguing with me.)
To: bluefish
I could have sworn that this was an Onion article when I first started reading it. Please somebody tell me that this isn't for real. It isn't for real.
OK, I lied. But it was a nice thought while it lasted, wasn't it?
I sent this on to a few folks, and commented that sometimes it would be nice if it was April 1st.
202 posted on
06/22/2004 2:38:09 AM PDT by
Don Joe
(We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
To: bluefish; JohnHuang2; Howlin
I could have sworn that this was an Onion article when I first started reading it. Well, it is from WorldNetDaily.
I read the Executive Summary. Maybe I missed it, seems to me this refers to People with Disabilities. Not the entire population.
262 posted on
06/22/2004 4:34:13 AM PDT by
Corin Stormhands
(Osama remains "missing" 'cause Michael Moore ate him...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson