Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackRazor


This poll was conducted by Research 2000, and they were very accurate in 2000.. among the best. I think it's close to being accurate..

Mason-Dixon had Bush by 7 in a mid-May poll., Mason-Dixon was also very accurate in 2000.

Two of the best polling services from 2000, have similar results, I think we need to accept them as fact, unless you want to keep your head in the clouds and only accept good news and ignore bad.


Research 2000, 6/13-6/16, Bush 47-42.
Mason-Dixon, 5/14-5/17, Bush 48-41.

I would put Bush's North Carolina lead at 6.


27 posted on 06/24/2004 6:15:13 AM PDT by Josh in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Josh in PA
I think we need to accept them as fact, unless you want to keep your head in the clouds and only accept good news and ignore bad.

Please cite where I have kept my "head in the clouds" and only accepted good news while ignoring bad. I think most people who read my posts on a regular basis would vouch for my objectivity in interpreting poll results, and say that I probably lean a bit to the more cautious side.

28 posted on 06/24/2004 7:34:13 AM PDT by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson