Hmmm...trying to make the case that there was no connection based on one meeting when there is plenty of other evidence available to prove a connection? Sounds like a Knut Case to me... : )
It is strange to me that some folks get so sensitive about any information that calls into question one piece of the puzzle. Sure, it would be a strong piece of evidence IF a Fedayeen officer was at the Kuala Lumpur meeting. But only if he was. If he wasn't, why would anyone want to further the impression that he was?