Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger on the Verge of California Budget Victory
tampa bay online ^ | Jun 24, 2004 | Tom Chorneau Associated Press Writer

Posted on 06/24/2004 12:15:06 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach


Advertisement

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) - Sure, he has charisma and starpower, the skeptics said when Arnold Schwarzenegger was running for governor, but can he handle the day-to-day drudgery of governing, such as passing a budget?

The skeptics are about to get their answer.

Just days before the June 30 end of California's budget year, the actor-turned-Republican-governor looks as if he is going to extract most of what he wants from the Democratic-controlled Legislature and pass his $103 billion spending plan on time.

Using dealmaking skills many lawmakers didn't know he had, Schwarzenegger has reached agreements with a variety of interest groups to help eliminate a $17 billion deficit.

So far, teachers, school officials, state universities and local government leaders have all agreed to accept short-term spending cuts in return for improvements in the future. And on Monday, Schwarzenegger reached a deal with five Indian tribes for a major expansion of casino gambling that would bring the state $1 billion this budget year.

"You've got to believe that the governor is setting himself up very well as the dominant individual in state politics," said Larry Gerston, a political science professor at San Jose State University. "The shadow he is casting right now is so long you can hardly see the Capitol."

While Schwarzenegger has been helped by an improving economy, if he gets a budget passed before the June 30 deadline, he will have accomplished something California has done only twice in the past decade because of bitter partisan gridlock. The man Schwarzenegger ousted in a recall election last fall, Democrat Gray Davis, could not meet the deadline in his last three years in office.

"He is moving the process the only way possible, with much dexterity and determination," said Democratic former Gov. Jerry Brown, now mayor of Oakland.

Schwarzenegger's spending plan does not raise taxes. But it uses billions of dollars in borrowing, accounting gimmicks and one-time savings to get through another year. Most of the big reforms he promised during the election remain on his to-do list.

"This year is all about stopping the hemorrhaging," said Allan Hoffenblum, a GOP consultant in Los Angeles. "He's only been in office a few months. Give him another year."

Since his election in October, Schwarzenegger has claimed several victories that have enhanced his power. Upon taking office, he repealed an unpopular increase in the car tax and forced lawmakers to repeal a law allowing illegal immigrants to obtain driver's licenses.

In March, he persuaded voters to approve the nation's largest state bond issue - $15 billion in borrowing. He also brokered a deal to reform the state's costly workers' compensation system.

Schwarzenegger moved early to gather support for his budget proposal, even before the final version had been released to lawmakers in May. He outflanked the Democrats by negotiating a series of side agreements with key interest groups.

Some Democrats are worried about the governor's growing clout and may try to hold up the budget if only to remind their constituents that they are still California's majority party.

Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez said lifting a cap on freshman enrollment at state universities is his No. 1 priority. He also wants to rescind a wage cut for home health care workers. And some Democrats want to provide a cost-of-living increase in welfare checks.

All together, the Democratic list would add less than $500 million to the Schwarzenegger spending plan - less than 1 percent of the overall budget.

Gerston said that while many of the governor's solutions simply push problems off into the future, the Democrats appear to be putting up only token resistance.

"Democrats either go ahead and look the other way or they fight it," he said. "Clearly they appear to be going with the flow."

---

On the Net:

Governor's Home Page: http://www.governor.ca.gov/state/govsite/gov-homepage.jsp

California Assembly: http://www.assembly.ca.gov/acs/defaulttext.asp

California Senate: http://www.sen.ca.gov

AP-ES-06-24-04 1352EDT


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 06/24/2004 12:15:06 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; calcowgirl; farmfriend; FairOpinion

Is this true?


2 posted on 06/24/2004 12:20:55 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Shall I post McClintock's proposal to balance the budget again? LOL

13% off the top gets you to the goal line in a year!


3 posted on 06/24/2004 12:22:24 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

But Arnold is actually getting his budget passed, which McC could never accomplish.

"While Schwarzenegger has been helped by an improving economy, if he gets a budget passed before the June 30 deadline, he will have accomplished something California has done only twice in the past decade because of bitter partisan gridlock.

Schwarzenegger moved early to gather support for his budget proposal, even before the final version had been released to lawmakers in May. He outflanked the Democrats by negotiating a series of side agreements with key interest groups. "


4 posted on 06/24/2004 12:26:24 PM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Shall I post McClintock's proposal to balance the budget again?

Sure...and while you're at it post Bustamante's $9 Billion tax increase proposal.

5 posted on 06/24/2004 12:27:01 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Shall I post McClintock's proposal to balance the budget again? LOL

Please let us know how that plan is coming? Got any votes for it?

6 posted on 06/24/2004 12:28:14 PM PDT by w1andsodidwe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And some Democrats want to provide a cost-of-living increase in welfare checks.

So in an economic environment where many workers are getting zero or minuscule pay increases, people who are refusing to work would get a COLA. Yeah, that makes sense.

7 posted on 06/24/2004 12:28:37 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ
But Arnold is actually getting his budget passed, which McC could never accomplish.

So why not adopt McC idea & forget about a bond.

8 posted on 06/24/2004 12:29:15 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Just days before the June 30 end of California's budget year, the actor-turned-Republican-governor looks as if he is going to extract most of what he wants from the Democratic-controlled Legislature and pass his $103 billion spending plan on time.

Note that AP says this is "his $103 billion dollar pending plan"...

Gray never broke 100 billion.. tho he would have liked to, Im sure.

Where the heck is all this money going and how did we jump from 75-80 billion a year to 103 billion and call it a victory?

To social enclaves that are called schools these days and to pay for benefits for illegals, for starters.

Some victory ..lol ;-)

9 posted on 06/24/2004 12:29:47 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Godspeed x40 ... Support Our Troops!!! ......Become a FR Monthly Donor ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

pending=spending


10 posted on 06/24/2004 12:30:42 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Godspeed x40 ... Support Our Troops!!! ......Become a FR Monthly Donor ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

How much actual CUTTING is in this rumored-to-be-agreed-upon-soon budget? REAL cuts, not "reductions in previously-budget increases" that often are reported AS "cuts."


11 posted on 06/24/2004 12:30:51 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

I have been so out of the Loop on California News... I was surprised to see this.


12 posted on 06/24/2004 12:31:38 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Digger
So why not adopt McC idea & forget about a bond.

REALITY, that's why.
Let me say it again:
But Arnold is actually getting his budget passed, which McC could never accomplish.

What Arnold has been accomplishing is a miracle, considering that he is dealing with a Democratic Legislature.

13 posted on 06/24/2004 12:32:41 PM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Many people forget that Arnold is not just an actor. He also holds an MBA as do George W. Bush and Colin Powell.


14 posted on 06/24/2004 12:33:23 PM PDT by TheCPA (Co-author of Tax Stategies for the Self-Employed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

No mention in here about the agreement with the Indian tribes that according to the OC Register might kick in a billion or better.


15 posted on 06/24/2004 12:34:10 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"...because of bitter partisan gridlock..."

No, because of unreasonable spending demands by the RAT/Commie-bastards.

16 posted on 06/24/2004 12:35:31 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
No mention in here about the agreement with the Indian tribes that according to the OC Register might kick in a billion or better.

Sure there is:

So far, teachers, school officials, state universities and local government leaders have all agreed to accept short-term spending cuts in return for improvements in the future. And on Monday, Schwarzenegger reached a deal with five Indian tribes for a major expansion of casino gambling that would bring the state $1 billion this budget year.

17 posted on 06/24/2004 12:36:18 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"So far, teachers, school officials, state universities and local government leaders have all agreed to accept short-term spending cuts..."

Uh oh...The Arnold-haters are going to start spewing Al Gore levels of vitriol if "spending cuts" get much play in the news media!

18 posted on 06/24/2004 12:36:46 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

problem is that there are no cuts in the budget and the devil is in the details...
just more smoke and mirrors...
bonds and borrowing...
I understand they have increased fees too...
believe me, we would have been a hellofalot better off fiscally if we had elected McClintock...
but I am "holding fire" until I see if AS signs a driver's license bill for the illegals...


19 posted on 06/24/2004 12:37:24 PM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: QQQQQ
But Arnold is actually getting his budget passed, which McC could never accomplish.

LOL

So rude of you to be mentioning inconvenient things like "reality" ;-)

20 posted on 06/24/2004 12:38:31 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson