Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fahrenheit 9/11:Film Offers limited view
Newsday ^ | June 27 | Frank Thomas

Posted on 06/27/2004 4:31:15 AM PDT by johnnyjumpstart

Edited on 06/27/2004 6:57:46 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON - At the start of "Fahrenheit 9/11," filmmaker Michael Moore shows a clip of CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin saying that if ballots had been recounted in Florida after the 2000 presidential vote, "under every scenario Gore won the election."

What Moore doesn't show is that a six-month study in 2001 by news organizations including The New York Times, the Washington Post and CNN found just the opposite. Even if the Supreme Court had not stopped a statewide recount, or if a more limited recount of four heavily Democratic counties had taken place, Bush still would have won Florida and the election.

The inclusion of Toobin's minority view and exclusion of mainstream documentation typifies the shaky case Moore builds against President George W. Bush in his two-hour film.

The movie unearths nothing new. It is a cinematic lawsuit, not a verdict, that skews and omits events for its central charge: that Bush was soft on terrorism because his family is financially tied to wealthy Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fahrenheit911; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 06/27/2004 4:31:15 AM PDT by johnnyjumpstart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: johnnyjumpstart

Don't forget, the first Dimocrat request was to transfer Buchannan votes to Gore because the ballot was "confusing" (to the easily confused).

In the final count, the Dims counted many dimpled ballots for Gore, and he still lost.

The Florida Supreme Court made up a new deadline that had been set by the Florida Legislation.

And of course the news Dims called the election for Gore prematurely and so many voters in the Florida panhandle, a Bush stronghold, just went home instead of voting.


2 posted on 06/27/2004 4:48:10 AM PDT by libertylover (The Constitution is a roadmap to liberty. Let's start following it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: kellynla
Every time I read a thread about the Florida vote and how we barely survived and nearly had "Psycho Al" for President, I am compelled to visit a prayer thread next...
4 posted on 06/27/2004 5:36:04 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
I am compelled to visit a prayer thread next...
As well we all should. :-]
And the clown couldn't even carry his own state of Tennessee!
I'll let someone else post all the inaccuracies in Michelle Moron's propaganda flick...trying to get caught up on the Sunday am news.
5 posted on 06/27/2004 5:41:16 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Moore finds much stronger footing when he focuses on Bush's presidency. He accurately quotes a front-page Washington Post story from August 2001 noting that Bush had spent 42 percent of his presidency on vacation.

Does anyone know where the W. Post came up with the 42% number? It seems impossible to me, unless they counted weekends. I tried to search, but the only article I found I couldn't retrieve. I am curious, and mostly just sick of hearing this number.

6 posted on 06/27/2004 6:18:12 AM PDT by LizJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lepton

bookmark bump


7 posted on 06/27/2004 6:19:41 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnnyjumpstart
Fahrenheit 9/11:Film Offers limited view

Gee, ya think?

8 posted on 06/27/2004 6:21:25 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Moore finds much stronger footing when he focuses on Bush's presidency. He accurately quotes a front-page Washington Post story from August 2001 noting that Bush had spent 42 percent of his presidency on vacation.

So let me guess this straight? Bush is not allowed to go on vacations???
9 posted on 06/27/2004 6:22:07 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: johnnyjumpstart
Michael Moore shows a clip of CNN analyst Jeffrey Toobin saying that if ballots had been recounted in Florida after the 2000 presidential vote, "under every scenario Gore won the election." What Moore doesn't show is that a six-month study in 2001 by news organizations including The New York Times, the Washington Post and CNN found just the opposite.

EUREKA!! I'VE FIGGURED IT OUT!!

Michael Moore is the love child of Helen Thomas and Erich von Däniken!

In ‘Chariots of the God’, von Däniken would show some South American artifact, like the construction of Machu Picchu and authoritatively announce ‘Obviously it had to be ancient astronauts who did this’ and then charge off to another site before anyone had time to ‘yeah, but’ his outrageous theory.

10 posted on 06/27/2004 6:27:37 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
What is also never mentioned in the Bush vacation stories is that on many, world leaders stay at the Crawford ranch, a sign of respect that Clinton never could offer. This was because the Slickster always lived in taxpayer accommodations. The ones he could offer to world leaders became a joke, notably the Lincoln bedroom for sale to the highest bidder, and Camp David which the Clintons treated like a dump. The other leaders heard about this so they knew the Slickster was offering them nothing special.
11 posted on 06/27/2004 6:33:02 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LizJ

Vacation? The President is never really on vacation. It's a 24/7/365 kind of job.


12 posted on 06/27/2004 6:34:08 AM PDT by Skip Ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LizJ
Does anyone know where the W. Post came up with the 42% number? It seems impossible to me, unless they counted weekends.

Actually, a 42% vacation rate corresponds to a 4 day work week, if one counts Sat, Sun, and one other day as "vacation days."

13 posted on 06/27/2004 6:43:46 AM PDT by ez (TERRORISTS FOR KERRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LizJ

Everyone knows that the POUS is NEVER on vacation!

It's a 24/7 job and anyone who claims different is just being stupid!


14 posted on 06/27/2004 6:45:44 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: johnnyjumpstart
Moore finds much stronger footing when he focuses on Bush's presidency. He accurately quotes a front-page Washington Post story from August 2001 noting that Bush had spent 42 percent of his presidency on vacation.

He's not on any stronger footing here. He omitted the Washington Post's own disclaimer that the 42% vacation time included weekends and working vacations at Camp David!

15 posted on 06/27/2004 7:16:30 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla; ez; Skip Ripley
I agree 100% that it is a full time job. I am just wondering where this number comes from. My very loose math:

He was in office almost 8 months, so approximately 240 days. If you counted 30 days of August (a joke, I know) plus all weekend (maybe 70 days) you get 100/240 = 42%.

I am just wondering if that is how they came up with this number, since Moore is using it. I think the number is ridiculous, and I know his entire movie is a joke, but I am just wanting to know where the number came from. Some of what he is saying is becoming "common knowledge" among the general public, not just the fringe, and I find it very disturbing.

16 posted on 06/27/2004 7:17:56 AM PDT by LizJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago

Thanks, you just answered my question!


17 posted on 06/27/2004 7:19:30 AM PDT by LizJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LizJ
Does anyone know where the W. Post came up with the 42% number? It seems impossible to me, unless they counted weekends. I tried to search, but the only article I found I couldn't retrieve. I am curious, and mostly just sick of hearing this number.

Yes, it did include weekends. Pretty intellectually dishonest, considering that weekends comprise 28.5% of the week! The thing that gets me about this figure is that it's obviously a lie, yet the media unquestioningly parrots it because it's from the Washington Post. Nobody seems to want to look at the original source, and see that Moore intentionally left out the weekends information, and also the fact that much of the actual vacation time was working vacations.

18 posted on 06/27/2004 7:25:43 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
It's a 24/7 job and anyone who claims different is just being stupid!

Exactly !
19 posted on 06/27/2004 7:26:26 AM PDT by baseballmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LizJ
Here is a link to a blog pointing to the Washington Post story, with pictures of Bush during these "vacations":

http://lawroark.blog-city.com/read/663671.htm

20 posted on 06/27/2004 7:34:13 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson