Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Devil_Anse

Hi, DA, ...I recall all the "recorded calls before getting the news Scott was married or Laci missing" stories,..I know there was word she talked to a PI,etc....I don't know if this is relevent but I'm sure Geragos will muddy the waters with it...

Broncchini(ignores and hides a critical eyewitness, framing Scott,MUD), Kim M.(burglar, bipolar ,implicates is involved in Laci disappearance..MUD), Amber(is a lying husband stealing Linda Tripp...could be a suspect,MUD)


77 posted on 06/28/2004 1:46:20 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: MEG33

Hey, about this revelation that Amber was allegedly "double-crossing" the police by talking with Scott in a way she thought wasn't eavesdropped on: IMO, that revelation could work in favor of the prosecution.

Seems to me that if Amber has been totally 100% in the police's pocket since the end of Dec. 2002 (when she called police), then the defense could have said, "SHE'S out to frame/get/suspect poor Scott, too!"

But this way, it is clear that Amber still had some good feelings for Scott (barf), and therefore it should be clear to the jury that she was NOT out to frame Scott, that she had NOT come to any premature conclusions of whether he was guilty or not--and that will make her look MORE credible.


101 posted on 06/28/2004 3:06:52 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson