Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australia: SWORDS TO BECOME PROHIBITED WEAPONS
Australian Government ^ | 3/8/04 | Australian Government

Posted on 06/28/2004 8:07:38 PM PDT by BradJ

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: BradJ

Bad news for the Knights of Columbus.


21 posted on 06/28/2004 8:40:42 PM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradJ
"There are some cultural, religious, military and collector groups that have legitimate reasons to own swords,"

Right. Muslims need them for the beheadings.

Can't stop religous use of swords, but all you other wankers, forget it.

22 posted on 06/28/2004 8:44:56 PM PDT by sd-joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYCRebublican

Very probably.


23 posted on 06/28/2004 8:45:17 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BradJ

Many years ago, I was was taking a study break at about 3 in the morning and went to the local 7-11 to get some snacks and to talk to the clerk, a classmate of mine. As we were talking, a drunken frat-guy came swaggering into the store and demanded to cash a presonal check for $20. He was told that this was against store policy. He tried to argue but the clerk, who was 6'5" and looked something like a Viking, stared him down.

The drunk grumbled under his breath, then turned and spat on the glass door as he walked out. The clerk didn't see it, so I told him, "hey, Don, that [anus] just spat on your door."

Don looked up, saw the glob of spittle running down the glass and yelled, "why, that SOB, I'll cut him into little pieces!"

At that point, he reached under the counter, grabbed what turned out to be a genuine antique cavalry sabre, and charged into the parking lot waving the blade over his head. He cornered the miscreant as the latter tried to get into his car. "Spit on my door, you ******? I'm gonna' cut yer' ****ing arms and legs off and slice out yer' tongue if you ever show your **** ***** face around here again," the sword wielding clerk yelled.

The drunk started his car and departed in some haste.

I recovered from my amazement long enough to ask, "Er, what if he'd had a gun?"
"No sweat," Don responded. He then reached into his back pocket and took out a Walther PPK-S.
Needless to say, this was against the law, let alone company policy, but he was never caught. He never shot anyone or chopped them into pieces in the parking lot, at least not to my knowledge.
The drunk apparently didn't call the police, possibly for fear of not being believed, but it is a true story, so help me.
Don the clerk is now a State Department official in Asia and is still something of a sword fancier.


24 posted on 06/28/2004 8:45:32 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (A few words for the media: Julius Streicher, follow his path, share his fate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradJ
What do the "global leaders" have planned that is so bad, that the people must first be disarmed, not only of guns but also bladed weapons?

I don't even think the Nazis or Soviets banned swords.

25 posted on 06/28/2004 8:47:52 PM PDT by Mulder (Those who would give up liberty for temporary security, deserve neither -- Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradJ
"There are some cultural, religious, military and collector groups that have legitimate reasons to own swords..."

Well ain't that grand. No guns allowed, and the only ones that can have a Sword are Islamists.

Last year or so there was a court case here in the USA cause some grade school kids had a "religious" reason to wear daggers to school.

They won.

Tolerance...Give them an inch and they will take a Kill-O-Metre

26 posted on 06/28/2004 8:48:51 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradJ

So now, every rotten kid in Oz will go to practicing Sun Style and carrying canes. Then they'll outlaw canes, and gimps will be forced to crawl.


27 posted on 06/28/2004 8:51:15 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
I don't even think the Nazis or Soviets banned swords.

The Nazis and Soviets weren't up against stuck-in-the-12th-century møøselimbs...

28 posted on 06/28/2004 8:51:22 PM PDT by null and void (The light pours out of me/The cold light of day/Pours out of me/Leaving me black/And so healthy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BradJ

Eventually they will be banning butter knifes. Then only the crooks will have those also. They will be easy to spot too. They will be the ones with evenly buttered toast.


29 posted on 06/28/2004 8:52:40 PM PDT by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Start Charging for Email - You get 2000 a month for free, then you pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
I think that you're talking about Sikhs, and their religion DOES require them to go armed with a short blade at all times. They're also required to wear turbans.

If I remember correctly they're some kind of Hindu/Muslim hybrid religion.

30 posted on 06/28/2004 8:53:45 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BradJ

Lets not forget nail guns, staplers, hammers, pickaxes, scythes, and every variation of turkey carving apparatus. The Aussies have let their government turn them into a bunch of Tapioca eating sheep. You get what you pay for Matey.


31 posted on 06/28/2004 8:55:19 PM PDT by WideGlide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradJ

OK, first of all, it's not the Australian government doing this (which is a Liberal/National Coalition government and is conservative in nature). Rather it's the government of one state - Victoria - which has a Labor government - a socialist government).

Secondly, since the Police Minister made these statements nearly four months ago, the position has changed quite substantially. Swords will be added to the prohibited weapons list in Victoria. However, this does not mean swords have been made illegal - the prohibited weapons list doesn't actually prohibit weapons, despite its name.

Basically the only effect this change is going to have in reality is that minors won't be able to buy such weapons, and some slight differences on how the law deals with people who misuse them, or use them to commit crimes.

One example - a few weeks ago a nutcase with a sword attacked two policemen in Melbourne. They shot him and he died.

Now, obviously, a police shooting, needs to be investigated.

If swords had been on the PW list, the investigation would be over by now. He attacked police with a weapon. He was shot. End of story.

Because swords are not on the list, they've had to prove that they were attacked with a weapon, before they can even use the defence that they were attacked with a weapon.

What the changes don't do, though, is ban swords or make swords illegal. It just makes it easier for them to be treated as weapons in law, when they are used as weapons.

There's a *lot* of 'weapons' on the list that are sold openly and openly possessed.

The Police Minister wanted to do more - but he failed.

It's pretty much a non-story being stirred up by some people.

Now *if* the Minister decides to start prosecuting people, then there would be a story. But I doubt he's going to. They don't prosecute people for carrying knives and they've been on the list about 15 years.


32 posted on 06/28/2004 8:55:40 PM PDT by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradJ

Actually this is from the state government of Victoria, and not the Australian federal government. Victoria is well known in Australia for its politics of warm inner glow (or liberal politics in American terms) - its capital and largest city, Melbourne, is a lot like Toronto and Montreal of Canada, and San Francisco, Seattle, and Boston rolled together.


33 posted on 06/28/2004 8:55:55 PM PDT by NZerFromHK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piefloater
DAMNED JAPANESE TOURISTS!!!


34 posted on 06/28/2004 8:58:02 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Ah! Thanks for the clarification.


35 posted on 06/28/2004 8:59:59 PM PDT by null and void (The light pours out of me/The cold light of day/Pours out of me/Leaving me black/And so healthy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BradJ

Well there were these immortal guys who were chopping off each other's heads...


36 posted on 06/28/2004 9:01:14 PM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Bush/Cheney '04 - Win one for the Gipper!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Let's make this clear as well.

Guns *are* allowed in Australia. I've only just started posting today, but I've been reading these forums for quite a while, and I actually get pretty disturbed sometimes about the misinformation about Australia that gets posted here at times.

Australia has not banned guns. Simple fact. This has not happened. I got a fair collection myself all held on civilian permits. (I've also got one that I have on a military permit). The reason most of my weapons are on civilian permits is because I think it's important that the laws that allow citizens to own firearms are used.

Yes, we have stricter gun laws than most of the US. Yes, we have registration. Yes, the laws go too far in my opinion.

But they haven't disarmed us. Unless you've got a criminal record, you'll have no real problem owning a gun in Australia.

Owning an assault rifle or a handgun is a little harder - but you can still do it.

I'm not saying our laws are good laws - because they're not. But they don't go anywhere near as far as some people try to suggest they do here at times.


37 posted on 06/28/2004 9:02:39 PM PDT by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BradJ
Good Evening All-

The bliss ninnies will be happy because something is being done about something they don't like in their neighborhoods.

The frog never seems to realize how hot the water is getting until it's practically boiling...

~ Blue Jays ~

38 posted on 06/28/2004 9:03:40 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradJ

Wow. I would be a felon in Australia. Guess I won't ever move there.

There is no way the Government is getting my LOTR Sting sword from me.


39 posted on 06/28/2004 9:07:08 PM PDT by Chewbacca (There is a place in this world for all of God's creatures.....right next to the mashed potatoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
"[Hind. Sikh, properly, a disciple.] A religious sect noted for warlike traits, founded in the Punjab at the end of the 15th century.

Now I am even more confused. I thought Punjab was Little Orphan Annie's Big Brother. Or was that the Asp?

40 posted on 06/28/2004 9:07:35 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson