Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Pharmacist's View on Gay Marriage
Agape Press ^ | 29 Jun 04 | J.R. Schoenle, Pharm.D.

Posted on 06/29/2004 5:07:44 PM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping - I pung you all to this thread (was it only yesterday??) but check out post #77. Links and links of good stuff. For your archives, your relatives, your friends - good ammunition. Truth bullets.

As usual, let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.

(I must give up sleeping. Or maybe eating would be better. I need more reading and freeping time.)


81 posted on 06/30/2004 11:13:45 AM PDT by little jeremiah (http://www.mikegabbard.com - a REAL conservative running for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

No, because gay marriage isn't about ending promiscuity and encouraging monogamy. It's about getting legal rights not otherwise entitled to these individuals. This isn't about morality to them, it's about legality and politics.


82 posted on 06/30/2004 11:28:43 AM PDT by GigaDittos ("Vote Democrat, it's easier than getting a job")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
Then why get one of those nasty little government marriage licenses? As you say, you don't need it to live a good and moral life, bound to your betrothed in the eyes of the OPC. Is it that the license gives you certain perks which are not necessarily connected to the religious aspects of your private marriage that you find.....let us say....valuable?

No, the problem here is that so long as the State usurps to itself the authority to define and authorize the Legal constitution of a "Marriage", private Life-Partnership contracts are viewed as subordinate to the State's Rules of the Game. For example, Pre-Nuptial Agreements are a private-market response to the failures of State Marriage Law -- but the State still reserves to itself the authority to re-write or dismiss Pre-Nuptial Agreements which it considers "unfair". (In fact, I don't believe that a Nuptial Agreement would even be considered a Valid Contract by the State, without an accompanying Government Marriage License).

Ergo, there is no intrinsic "value" that Government Marriage Licenses "provide" which could not be better provided by Private Market contracts, except that the State has essentially monopolized unto itself the Contractual nature of Marriage by abrogating the natural authority of Private Nuptial Contracts. Thus, in order to enjoy any legally-valid contractual protection of one's marital station, it becomes necessary to comply with Government Marriage Licensing -- not because the State provides a "value" which the Private Market could not, but because the State has made itself the Only Game in Town.

83 posted on 06/30/2004 1:16:04 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson