Skip to comments.
Dems excited by prospects for VP
USA TODAY ^
| July 1, 2004
| Jill Lawrence
Posted on 07/01/2004 5:51:20 AM PDT by Independentamerican
Edited on 07/01/2004 6:08:36 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
[Gannett, allows headline and link only]
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kerry; veep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
I heard the Kerry is supposed to announce his running mate today ? Speculation is that it still could be the socialist Hillary..
To: Independentamerican
Even most liberals think Hillary would torpedo Kerry's chances.
2
posted on
07/01/2004 5:52:25 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
To: Independentamerican
Translation of headline: USA Today Thinks Dems Should Be Excited By Prospects For VP
3
posted on
07/01/2004 5:53:40 AM PDT
by
JennysCool
("I'm not worried about the deficit. It's big enough to take care of itself." - RWR)
To: cripplecreek
But it's not about Kerry, is it? And if Kerry doesn't have the testicular fortitude to tell the Toons to take a long walk off a short pier...
4
posted on
07/01/2004 5:54:57 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Independentamerican
Speculation is that it still could be the socialist Hillary.. Let me go out on a limb with an early prediction on this one... I've really doubt that Kerry would pick anybody whose political star might shine brighter than his - they tend to pick people who will not try to eclipse them within the political spotlight.
I don't think he will ever even seriously consider Hillary, and I even doubt Edwards. I think he'll pick a good, reliable "second stringer", not a potential rival.
5
posted on
07/01/2004 5:57:04 AM PDT
by
Kenton
("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
To: Independentamerican
It's obvious they are more excited about the VP candidate, whoever that might be, than their boring P candidate.
6
posted on
07/01/2004 5:57:55 AM PDT
by
lonestar
(Me, too!--Weinie)
To: Independentamerican
Catch the fever!
7
posted on
07/01/2004 5:58:10 AM PDT
by
ScottFromSpokane
(Re-elect President Bush: http://spokanegop.org/bush.html)
To: Independentamerican
Typical Democrat psycho-babble.
Like the bottom feeders they are, they scurry about, picking "dead meat" from among the carcasses of the deceased.
After this November they may well begin to understand why they are at the bottom of the food chain.
8
posted on
07/01/2004 6:05:57 AM PDT
by
G.Mason
(A war mongering, red white and blue, military industrial complex, Al Qaeda incinerating American.)
To: Kenton
If you are correct then Kerry will have no hope. Edwards would be his best bet right now. I think people are starting to see what Hillary is all about.
9
posted on
07/01/2004 6:07:46 AM PDT
by
Independentamerican
(Independent Sophomore at the University of MD)
To: Independentamerican
10
posted on
07/01/2004 6:09:10 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: Independentamerican
Saddam is available. He claims he isn't a criminal and the real criminal is George Bush.
He has obviously been coached by George Soros and Michael Moore.
Best line of the morning from attorney DiGenova on FoxNews.
11
posted on
07/01/2004 6:11:23 AM PDT
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedy family legacy - can't skipper a boat, can't fly, can't drive, can't ski)
To: Independentamerican
I think the French looking Kerry should choose Agore.
To: Navy Patriot
"I think the French looking Kerry should choose Agore."
It would be fun to watch how many popular votes Kerry gets if Gore is his VP.
13
posted on
07/01/2004 6:15:44 AM PDT
by
AngieGOP
(I never met a woman who became a stripper because she played with Barbie dolls as a kid)
To: AngieGOP
What -- is Jacque Chirac not available?
To: Rutles4Ever
"What -- is Jacque Chirac not available?"
Jacque Chirac is too busy cutting deals with terrorists.
15
posted on
07/01/2004 6:23:47 AM PDT
by
AngieGOP
(I never met a woman who became a stripper because she played with Barbie dolls as a kid)
To: Independentamerican
We want Walter Mondale!!!!!!!
To: Independentamerican
Speculation is that it still could be the socialist Hillary..
If it is what does that tell us about the pick? That Kerry/Clinton is a sure loser? I don't think Clinton would accept a VP slot if she thought the ticket would win as that then places her another 8 years out for a run herself.... jmo.
17
posted on
07/01/2004 6:28:43 AM PDT
by
deport
(Life is simpler when you plow around the stumps.)
To: cripplecreek
It would be a mistake for Hillary too. No way she would run in 2008 if she was the losing VP in 04.
It'll be Max Cleland. From the South, counters Zell Miller (both from Georgia), Vietnam Vet, Senate experience, disabled, beef against Republicans for "questioning his patriotism".
19
posted on
07/01/2004 6:29:37 AM PDT
by
vollmond
(DS2 CV-66 83-87)
To: Independentamerican
Drudge and Boston Globe are saying it will be announced on Tuesday.
20
posted on
07/01/2004 6:30:40 AM PDT
by
EllaMinnow
("President Reagan has left us, but he has left us stronger and better." President George W. Bush)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson