Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

human rights issues aside, why would you trust "scumbags" for good intelligence anyways. the people excluded have already proven themselves untrustworthy by their very nature. i doubt this had much effect of the gathering of relavent intelligence.


6 posted on 07/12/2004 12:51:16 AM PDT by unaffliliated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: unaffliliated
"human rights issues aside, why would you trust "scumbags" for good intelligence anyways"

For the same reason police use snitches, rate and weasels; they are on the inside or next to it and are the best source of information and intentions.

Regards,

14 posted on 07/12/2004 3:01:05 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: unaffliliated
why would you trust "scumbags" for good intelligence anyways.

First, one doesn't "trust" them, one uses them, normally with the incentive of cold, hard cash.

Second, one uses them because they hang out with the bad guys, the other scumbags upon whom you want to gain intelligence.

As for this story, once again there appears to have been a great deal of Reno/Gorelick interference in CIA operations, mainly in an effort to provide CYA to the Clinton White House (don't believe for a second that "human rights" was their actual concern).

The CIA really needs to be unleashed from the political process, particularly congressional "oversight" (aka meddling). Barring that it's a useless organization that should be completely dismanteled.

17 posted on 07/12/2004 3:56:07 AM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson