[Stone Mountain]

And if your kids were in the car with you?

Oh my god, they might actually see a pair of breasts. After that, it would probably better just to kill them than for them to have to live with that horror for the rest of their lives....

Besides, she wasn't flashing kids - she flashed a grown (but pathetically prudish) man. This is supposed to be a good use of our limited court system budget?

[Colofornian]

Oh my god, they might actually see a pair of breasts. After that, it would probably better just to kill them than for them to have to live with that horror for the rest of their lives....

Besides, "the eyes have it" (majority vote). What do I mean? Too many folks (not necessarily you) have to morally justify the pleasure they receive looking @ exposed breasts hangin' out in public on the internet.

And if they can't or won't condemn that self-behavior of voyeurism/sex addiction, how can they dare frown on any exposer in the public square?

Once public nudity is embraced by a voyeur's online endorsement, there is no place to draw the line on public nudity of any sort. All venues are fair game.

[pgyanke]

Your replies have been interesting and mildly entertaining. The point you all missed is that this behavior isn't just "wrong" it's against the law... indecent exposure.

Feel free to just tell your kids that this behavior isn't appropriate and say nothing about the legal issues. Then call the person who is actually supposed to uphold the law names when he does his duty.

Conservatives? No... selective moralists.