Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
Why should an out of state taxpayer pay for a forest they have no stake in?

Well, you get to visit. But why sould anyone pay for a forest, they're at best income generators, otherwise, well, leave them alone.

8 posted on 07/12/2004 5:44:29 PM PDT by SJackson (Be careful -- with quotations, you can damn anything, Andre Malraux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
Well, you get to visit. But why sould anyone pay for a forest, they're at best income generators, otherwise, well, leave them alone.

I am saying that these forests have costs. They usually have roads. They have fire prevention. Maybe even rescue. Some garbage collection. No telling what all they have. And I am saying that if it's a national forest, then it makes sense not only for the national gubmint to pay for it, but also for the national gubmint to run it. If the state is gonna run it, far as I am concerned, that's a state forest that I as a voter have no stake in, no influence, and therefore, shouldn't pay a red cent for it. If GWB wants to make em state forests, he should do so.

15 posted on 07/12/2004 6:02:39 PM PDT by Huck (I love the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson