To: Jackie-O
There's a good chance that the blood in the boat is not SP's. Remember the crime evidence guy examined SP for scratches and abrasions that he would have received in a scuffle. Geragos was anxious to get the guy on record as having not detected any recent scratches or abrasions. So where did the blood in the boat come from?
To: RGSpincich
43 posted on
07/13/2004 2:10:08 PM PDT by
Canadian Outrage
(IAll us Western Canuks belong South!!!)
To: RGSpincich
The boat cover or tarp...the one Scott originally had in truck on 24th and was found under leaking gas blower on 26th also had small pieces of concrete on it, concrete residue found in boat...Robert Johnson noted forklift by pictured boat, method of placing Laci in boat?...in warehouse.Lots of putting pieces together required by jury..Prosecution is challenged to put them together.
Janey says the prosecution has nothing...other defense attorney says not enough evidence, though he may be guilty.
I say the timeline evidence shows, Scott's lies show that no one else could have done it but Scott.
44 posted on
07/13/2004 2:19:40 PM PDT by
MEG33
(John Kerry has been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security)
To: RGSpincich
But I thought Scott told people that they "would" find his blood in the truck because he had cut himself that very day. No scratches?
54 posted on
07/13/2004 5:24:51 PM PDT by
Howlin
(John Kerry & John Edwards: Political Malpractice)
To: RGSpincich; All
The list that Crier had on her show today of items seized from Snott on the day of his arrest was astounding! I can't find a full inventory yet but it was quite extensive, and CLEARLY demonstrated that he was going to flee and become a fugitive.
ALSO today on Abrams, the Pros has lost 93 of 200 evidence photos????
57 posted on
07/13/2004 6:04:22 PM PDT by
Jackie-O
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson