Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High Bias "Mainstream" reporters aren't just liberal--they're fanatical.
The Wall Street Journal ^

Posted on 07/13/2004 3:33:44 PM PDT by mc6809e

Edited on 07/14/2004 4:34:43 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

When Fox News Channel was founded by Rupert Murdoch, the consensus was that no startup all-news cable channel could possibly compete with CNN, and if any startup had a chance, it was MSNBC, which had the combined clout of NBC's esteemed news division and Microsoft, which in those days was believed to own the future.

Now, almost a decade later, Fox News Channel has left both CNN and MSNBC in the dust. There's no guarantee that this is permanent, of course. But it certainly has the left in a panic. They hated it that American conservatism had any voice at all, back when it was confined to a few radio talk shows--remember how everybody wanted to blame Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk-radio hosts for the Oklahoma City bombing?

Now, though, to have Fox News Channel be the source for the largest portion of America's TV news junkies just sticks in their craw. How could such a thing happen? Scott Collins, author of "Crazy Like a Fox: The Inside Story of How Fox News Beat CNN," thinks he has the answer.

It's not what Fox claims--that the American news media have a pronounced and painful liberal bias, so that huge numbers of Americans had given up on TV news, only to return in droves when Fox News offered them a balanced, trustworthy source of information. No, it's that a large number of Americans believed that the news was biased. How they got this idea is that they were . . . hmmm . . . idiots? But no matter. Mr. Collins repeatedly states that the perception is what mattered, and by homing in on the audience dumb enough to think the media was biased, Fox News won the ratings race (but not, of course, the race for quality news coverage).

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bias; media; mediabias; orsonscottcard; osc

1 posted on 07/13/2004 3:33:44 PM PDT by mc6809e
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

the writer of this article is Orson Scott Card


2 posted on 07/13/2004 4:12:17 PM PDT by DameAutour (It's not Bush, it's the Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc; Steel Wolf; prairiebreeze; LadyDoc

Worth some bump lists, don't you think, quidnunc? I don't know how to do that. Thanks.


3 posted on 07/13/2004 4:58:25 PM PDT by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MoralSense
MoralSense wrote: Worth some bump lists, don't you think, quidnunc? I don't know how to do that. Thanks.

I don't keep any ping lists, but Tolik does.

Perhaps you could suggest it to him.

4 posted on 07/13/2004 5:03:55 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

This is the best!


5 posted on 07/13/2004 5:04:40 PM PDT by netmilsmom ("We haven't begun military action. the world will know when we do." -Marine in Fallujah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

bump


6 posted on 07/13/2004 7:39:35 PM PDT by RippleFire ("It was just a scratch")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e; All
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/918370/posts
Creator of 'Mr. Sterling' Admits: We TV Writers Are '99% Leftist'
NewsMax.com ^ | 5/27/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Professor's Study Shows Liberal Bias in News Media


CyberAlert -- 05/07/1996 -- NQ CyberAlert
... recent Freedom Forum survey of Washington reporters and bureau chiefs revealed 89
percent voted for Clinton versus 7 percent for Bush in 1992. Do you think the ...

Great Debate#9
... opinions skew their professional writing. Nuzzo pointed out that a 1995 Freedom
Forum survey showed 89 percent of the media voted for Bill Clinton while the ...

Break up Microsoft?...Then how about the media "Big Six"? [ ...
... Why? They're usually wrong. 92% voted for Clinton. Libertarians, by contrast,
much enjoy being Right. You may (continue to?) derive your understanding of ...

-Poll confirms Ivy League liberal tilt--

The Politics of Hollywood
Uncommon Knowledge ^ | July 20, 2001 | Peter Robinson
A poll by the Center for the Study of Social and Political Change in 1992, eighty-three percent of film and television writers, directors and producers voted for Bill Clinton. Eighty-three percent. The vote that Clinton received in the country at large, forty-three percent.

No Bias in Media, ha ha, tee hee

7 posted on 07/14/2004 12:28:00 AM PDT by backhoe (1990's? Decade of Frauds. 2000's? Decade of Lunatics...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolik

Worth some bump lists, Tolik?


8 posted on 07/14/2004 4:30:08 AM PDT by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MoralSense
Thanks. It is a very good article. It was posted here, here and here. I think OSC can be posted as many times as freepers wish, but the ping list was already pinged (twice I think). Thanks a lot anyway.

BUMP for Orson Scott Card.
9 posted on 07/14/2004 5:14:16 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson