Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush gives right RSVP to NAACP
New York Daily News ^ | 7/14/04

Posted on 07/14/2004 2:15:06 AM PDT by kattracks

You've been maligned as appealing to the "underside of American culture." You and your political party "preach racial neutrality and practice racial division." Your "idea of equal rights is the American flag and Confederate swastika flying side by side." You have "selected nominees from the Taliban wing of American politics, appeased the wretched appetites of the extreme right wing and chosen cabinet officials whose devotion to the Confederacy is nearly canine in its uncritical affection."

You have led your nation into a "war of occupation" that is based on "the crass obstruction of the truth." Oh, and don't forget, you "want to write bigotry back into the Constitution."

Let's face it, folks: If the chairman of an organization used his platform to castigate you with that vehemence, would you make nice-nice? Not likely. Which is why President Bush is this week conspicuous by his absence from the NAACP convention in Philadelphia.

His foes say he has "dissed" the members and, by extension, all African-Americans. Which is a libel. He is merely refusing to demean himself with cheap favor-currying.

The quotes above come from speeches by NAACP Chairman Julian Bond, including an address to the convention Sunday. Bond has hardly been ratcheting down the rhetoric and is not alone among the NAACP hierarchy in being highly critical of the President. He has every right to say, for example, that he was afraid Bush would "announce he was going to repeal the 14th Amendment." But Bond & Co. then must recognize that such over-the-top partisanship moves the NAACP a long way from the mission of advancing the causes of civil rights and racial equality.

Bond's speech Sunday was nothing less than a call to dump Bush and elect Sen. John Kerry over fundamental disagreements on issues as wide-ranging as tax policy, the environment and the war in Iraq. Again, that's fine if the NAACP desires to be a political advocacy organization along the stripes of Michael Moore.

And Bush has every right to respond however he wants without being subjected to holier-than-thou dudgeon. You don't demean someone and then expect him to show up at your house with roses.

Said Bush the other day, "I would describe my relationship with the current leadership [of the NAACP] as basically nonexistent." Which is the completely justifiable reason his attendance at its convention is nonexistent.

[snip]

You can e-mail the Daily News editors at voicers@edit.nydailynews.com. Please include your full name, address and phone number. The Daily News reserves the right to edit letters. The shorter the letter, the better the chance it will be used.

Originally published on July 14, 2004



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush43; naacp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2004 2:15:06 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
this is the DAILY NEWS????

I thought they were liberals??

2 posted on 07/14/2004 2:17:02 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
The NAACLP are the Le Pew of American politics. I can understand why President Bush doesn't want to snuggle up next to them. Unlike the editors of the Los Angeles Times, the New York Daily News does get why the President refuses to grace them with the honor of his presence.
3 posted on 07/14/2004 2:19:51 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
They are, but lately their editorials have been very favorable towards President Bush.

I guess common sense does break through to some of them eventually.

4 posted on 07/14/2004 2:22:13 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

wow. One issue where they seem to get it.


5 posted on 07/14/2004 2:22:16 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I bet that bugs the NY Times to no end.


6 posted on 07/14/2004 2:22:58 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I think Allan Keyes was right when he said Bush should go and tell them EXACTLY what the Republicans do and want to do for the blacks.

He should go and stick it to 'em.

7 posted on 07/14/2004 2:25:59 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Maria Sharapova, please endorse G.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Confederate Swastika?

I must have "missed something" in the history books. :{

8 posted on 07/14/2004 2:26:03 AM PDT by Free Trapper (Because we ate the green mammals first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; GeronL; goldstategop
N

ever

A

nger

A

dam

C

layton

P

owell

Jr.

9 posted on 07/14/2004 2:26:03 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid ("Whatever helps ya sleep at night, ya douche!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Trapper
Confederate Swastika?

please, northerners are just like that. Probably this idiots way of saying the stars and bars.

10 posted on 07/14/2004 2:30:04 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Scourge of Yazid
haha

Snort N Tort


defeat the lawyerly beast!
11 posted on 07/14/2004 2:31:25 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Perhaps a bit of public praise is due here :).

Laura Ingraham read a piece from a(n) 1970's piece on her show. It was an editorial from the News, circa. 1970(ish), when Kerrey testified before Congress. I tried to find it on her site with no luck. Did anyone else hear this?
12 posted on 07/14/2004 2:36:19 AM PDT by hmmmmm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Thought maybe they'd done another "rewrite" of history.

Some of that bunch are pretty good at it.

13 posted on 07/14/2004 2:39:06 AM PDT by Free Trapper (Because we ate the green mammals first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; cyborg
"Lawyerly beast?"

Is that Bill or Hillary?

14 posted on 07/14/2004 2:39:45 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid ("Whatever helps ya sleep at night, ya douche!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Scourge of Yazid

Kerry-Edwards... Snort n Tort


15 posted on 07/14/2004 2:49:34 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Free Trapper

Exactly. Next thing you know Jefferson Davis was declaring the southern states a Reich


16 posted on 07/14/2004 2:50:12 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Trueblackman; Petronski

FReeper, trueblackman, was on Hannity & Colmes discussing this issue tonight. He did a great job!

Link to a quote and 'live thread':

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1170675/posts?page=220#220


17 posted on 07/14/2004 2:50:36 AM PDT by windchime (Where in the world is Joseph C. Wilson?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Rush refers to them as the NAALCP. I think it is more accurate to refer to this organization as the NAACPVD: National Association for Assuring Colored People Vote Democrat.

Except I think if I say "colored people" I will be declared a racist.


18 posted on 07/14/2004 2:56:55 AM PDT by TN4Liberty (Kerry and Edwards = Flip and Flop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Trapper

"Confederate Swastika?
I must have "missed something" in the history books. :{"


I would consider this indicative of the level of knowledge of those who still take the National Association to Abuse Caucasian Persons seriously.


19 posted on 07/14/2004 3:00:47 AM PDT by RipSawyer ("Embed" Michael Moore with the 82nd airborne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Jefferson Davis was black,wasn't he? (snicker) ;)


20 posted on 07/14/2004 3:02:14 AM PDT by Free Trapper (Because we ate the green mammals first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson