Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Malesherbes

Of course. But what struck me was that Republicans let them take the easy way out. If they had to vote on the language of the amendment directly, I wonder how many of the 52 would still have had the courage to vote NO? I think if brought to a direct vote, it would get 67 votes and possibly more. No Senator wants to be on record as being against marriage. Which is as American as apple pie. So I am confident about the future.


130 posted on 07/14/2004 10:40:07 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop

On an up-or-down vote on the amendment, R's would probably have lost Smith, Specter, DeWine, Allen, Warner, Hagel, Stevens, and maybe more.


144 posted on 07/14/2004 10:46:30 AM PDT by mdwakeup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson