Posted on 07/14/2004 10:52:50 AM PDT by smonk
If not murder, John F. Kerry and John Edwards have accused President Bush of something close to criminally negligent homicide in Iraq. "They were wrong and soldiers died because they were wrong," Kerry said of the Bush administration over the weekend.
--SNIP--
The trouble is, both Sens. Kerry and Edwards voted yes on the resolution authorizing the war in Iraq. And now they refuse to say whether they would have supported the resolution if they had known what they know today. Both say they can't be bothered with "hypothetical questions."
But whether it is a hypothetical question depends on how you phrase it. Do they regret these votes? Were their votes a mistake? These are not hypothetical questions. And they are questions the Democratic candidates for president and vice president cannot duck if they wish to attack Bush on Iraq in such morally charged language.
"is eight years older than Jack Kennedy... "
But you're not JFK, mister !
In sum, the LAT's prob is that Edwards is not Dean. They're damning him from the hard, "Bush lied" left. But practically speaking, at least they're damning him. It shows the Dem ticket hasn't an intellectual/moral leg to stand on.
known far and wide for "intellectual slovenliness and opportunism."
And we got the Cuban Missile Crisis out of that presidency, as I recall.
Treason 1 and Treason 2
"The LA Times is playin' hardball. Basically, it accuses Edwards of being an empty suit."
well, they may be a liberal paper, but I grant they can grasp the obvious quite well!
Yeah, but they can only endorse Ralph Nader now.
That'll work! ;)
Now all we need is a long line of "usefull idiots" following behind them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.