Beauseant!
Posted on 07/14/2004 7:50:19 PM PDT by Lancelot Jones
If George Bush was President before WWII and had preemptively hit Germany and Hitler, think how the world would have screamed. The infamous Dulles brothers scamming for their German friends in industry and high places, would have gone ballistic. Many Americans were tied to German industry and the SS. Especially when it was time to save the industrialists of Germany and the SS Generals from being tried as war criminals. (1)
Had President Roosevelt pulled a "pre-emptive Bush" move, the French, British, the banks of the Swiss, the Rockefellers would have castigated Roosevelt as a war monger and starting an unnecessary war. Money always came before preemption in the world of high finance, industry politics and duplicity.
PREEMPTIVE APPEASEMENT
You do realize or remember that such nations as France and England decided to sell out Czechoslovakia in order to appease Hitler. Adolph Hitler could have been stopped preemptively had the French, English, Poles and Russians stood up to him before he got rolling but, they thought that preemptive appeasement would work instead. Europe bled - as did America, for their unwillingness to face a tyrant in real time.
A ‘Bush’-type character with ideas of preemption against Germany would have been screamed at by the Europeans and drummed out of the banks of New York, particularly by the Rockefellers. Bush is being castigated now for interfering with Saddam’s Iraq, with Iran, Syria, North Korea and Libya on his rolling horizon against Global Terror.
They cheered Roosevelt after he belatedly entered the War, sufficiently late so Hitler had officially gotten off to a good start in absorbing most of the European nations. (To be fair, Roosevelt wanted to enter the war earlier but, he held back because isolationists in America thought Hitler was only Europe’s problems.) When Chamberlain realized that appeasement wouldn’t work - only then did the nations of Europe bleat and cry for assistance as Hitler’s thugs, the SS, began their reign of Terror in earnest. Perhaps it has always been thus when the weak would hang on to the strong, dragging them back so they could not fight evil. Always the weak and cowardly were the pallbearers of the once strong nations and civilizations.
It is happening again today. President George W. Bush has preemptively engaged Global Terrorism and he is being hounded for daring to take on Arab Muslim Terror. I grant you that, as a politician, we hear his political babble over how wonderful Muslims and Islam are. That’s the politician talking but, the facts on the ground speak otherwise.
He has attacked World Terror in Afghanistan and Iraq while it had not yet reached its full maturity. We are seeing the Terrorists of Al Qaeda connected to all other Terrorists forced into the open prematurely. Had we waited another three to five years, we would have faced a fully armed and mature force, guaranteed to have acquired WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) including NBC (Nuclear, Biological and Chemical). 9/11 was America’s second Pearl Harbor (which we wrote on the day they attacked). We also quoted the Japanese Commander who foresaw the end for his country’s war when he said: "We have awakened a sleeping giant"..
Bush forced the Hitlerian Muslim ‘Jihad’ (Holy War) into action before it was fully ready. But, the weak ones, the Banks, the oil maggots hated the disruption in their cash flow. The price we are paying now is a small price compared to what we have or will pay. We are now experiencing the threats of WMD but, the threats are less credible than had Bush not preempted their full maturity.
We would have faced a Saddam who could have fought a full Nuclear, Biological and Chemical war in time. We are facing this now from North Korea and Iran because we were reluctant to face them down in real time. Clinton appeased North Korea and simply didn’t want to see and, therefore, have to face the lie.
Bush may have very well saved the civilized world with or without their permission. You see the civilized world is weak and always ready to accept a conqueror or, at least, attempt appeasement. Islam, in its ruthlessness, is intimidating a weak Europe which is absorbing hundreds of thousands of immigrating Muslims. Europe, in deference to the Arabs, wants Israel to fall into its hands like over ripe fruit, ready to fall off the tree as they try to appease the Palestinian Arab Muslims in Gaza with the human sacrifice of the Jewish State.
Regretfully, as in all nations - the trash who comes to political power are not moral or ethical but are the weak ones, the pallbearers of their own nation. Israel has this problem which it has yet to solve.
President Bush has poor advisors who have not grasped what he has accomplished. They do not know how to tell the story of a President who has preemptively saved the world and this nation by stripping away the false front that Global Terror was hiding behind. They are trying to tell this story now but, their explanations seem false and, of course, are quite late.
The pallbearers now want one John and another John, who is personal injury lawyer, in order to escape the burden of facing what will not go away - Global Terror free to strike in our free country. They want another Chamberlain who could never see the evil in Hitler until it was too late. As Chamberlain said on his death bed: "It would have been all right if only Hitler hadn’t lied to me!"
I do not agree with Bush on his concept of forcing Israel to bow and give in to the Arab Muslim Palestinian Terrorists. In this he weakens his message on fighting Global Terror wherever it occurs. Israel has been fighting her own full scale war despite being restrained by Bush for political purposes. It’s a shame and betrays a weakness in Bush for doing it and Israel for caving into it.
Know this. In spite of these things: in spite of his father and the Arab cabal that hangs on to the Bush family, despite the Arabist State Department defending Saudi Arabia and Syria, President Bush has moved ahead against Global Terror. This is a story yet to be told but, not by the blind amateurs who surround him and cannot understand what Bush has achieved.
George Bush has shaken the confidence of Dictators and sent their proxy Terrorists scrambling for cover. They are, however, still operational and must be tracked to their spider holes and eliminated - preferably by big bombs from above and not American soldiers putting themselves in harm’s way to protect the civilians who the Terrorists use for their ‘human shields’.
In closing, I am on the horns of a dilemma or, as Tevya would have said: "On one hand", we have a President who is willing to fight Global Terrorism but, "on the other hand", we have a President who is dismantling Israel - which will bring a terrible calamity to America.
As G-d said: "I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you."
Beauseant!
Bush doctrine is at work-its just that many people wont see it.
Thank you for the response.
There are also many, many people trying to attract attention away from the fact that Bush is wining the war on terror.
Beauseant!
History is going to be very kind to George W. Bush, in 2009 when he boards Marine One for the last time, he will have changed the world
Bush has already changed the face of the world.
Beauseant!
Cheers!
bump
Indeed.
Beauseant!
Avenger of the Bones
We have the equivalent in our apoligists for Islamofascism who never fail to condemn the U.S. and Israel and who always find a way to excuse (or at least ignore) the latest crimes of the terrorists, even in some cases to the point of virtually declaring solidarity with the terrorists. They think the 9/11 attacks were a good thing and they believe the only problem was the attacks didn't go far enough -- it reminds me of other apologists for earlier forms of fascism who crawl out of the sewers from time to time to spew their poison.
Great article.
I must however point out that the whole annoying icon, HTML-ladden post thingy is already spoken for here in FR.
Great article.
I must however point out that the whole annoying icon, HTML-ladden post thingy is already spoken for here in FR.
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
I grant you that, as a politician, we hear his political babble over how wonderful Muslims and Islam are. That’s the politician talking but, the facts on the ground speak otherwise.
I wonder what leads the writer to say this?
In speech after speech after speech after speech he has said that we are NOT at war with Islam(unlike the nuke Mecca crowd here).
bttt
bump and thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.