Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grounds for Appeal? Clinton-Era Solicitor General to Make Case [for Martha]
ABCNEWS.com ^ | July 15, 2004 | Ellen Davis & Richard Esposito

Posted on 07/15/2004 3:22:37 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian

One-time Clinton White House legal adviser Walter Dellinger will take on the appeal for Martha Stewart after her sentencing Friday morning, and ABC News has learned the details of Dellinger's argument for a stay in her sentence pending appeal.

The appellate expert and former solicitor general, who argued nine cases before the Supreme Court, will steer legal efforts on her behalf from the time of her sentencing on — taking over for Bob Morvillo, who leads the defense team to that stage. Dellinger has been working side by side with the defense team for several months to prepare appeal arguments, even as the defense offered now-thwarted arguments for a new trial, presentencing information to the Department of Probation, and Friday's anticipated arguments for a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines.

Stewart has been convicted on four counts, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, two counts of making false statements, and obstruction of justice, and is expected to face 10-16 months in prison.

But Dellinger will argue to Judge Miriam Cedarbaum that because Stewart's chances of winning an appeal are reasonable, the court should stay any sentence pending that appeal.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: dellinger; martha; marthastewart

1 posted on 07/15/2004 3:22:39 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Martha's hubris will make her file an appeal.

Rather than just start her sentence, she will try to delay the inevitable.


2 posted on 07/15/2004 3:30:16 PM PDT by annyokie (Now with 20% More Infidel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

16 years sounds better than 16 months.


3 posted on 07/15/2004 3:33:41 PM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jocko12

It won't happen. She'll get sentenced to 12 months and out in six then six in a halfway house.


4 posted on 07/15/2004 3:35:17 PM PDT by annyokie (Now with 20% More Infidel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jocko12

It won't happen. She'll get sentenced to 12 months and out in six then six in a halfway house.


5 posted on 07/15/2004 3:38:50 PM PDT by annyokie (Now with 20% More Infidel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

I hope she wins because she is a scapegoat for federal mismanagement of the economy. Normally, what she was originally accused of would have been handled as a civil matter.


6 posted on 07/15/2004 3:40:49 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocko12

From my point of view she shouldn't be doing a second. Any time there is a run away federal prosecutor we should all be concerned.
If in fact she is guilty of anything, she should have simply been fined.


7 posted on 07/15/2004 3:47:36 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Is Billy Goat Clinton behind this effort? After all, she was a big donor to the RATs and his campaigns. It's time for ther to do some time--say about 18 months in a good slammer.


8 posted on 07/15/2004 3:52:22 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Is Billy Goat Clinton behind this effort? After all, she was a big donor to the RATs and his campaigns. It's time for her to do some time--say about 18 months in a good slammer.


9 posted on 07/15/2004 3:52:47 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Lurking Libertarian
Has kmart no shame, they are still running commercials featuring that convicted felon as a spokesman,,,of course the whoopie ones were worse because they implied if you use slimfast your comming out of it real pigface down to the bone ugly! Wanna be just like ole whoopie???? What were the muckety mucks who make slimfast thinking to put up a horrible before and "after" like that?
11 posted on 07/15/2004 4:07:44 PM PDT by aspiring.hillbilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson