Skip to comments.
Issues From the Left – Answers That Work
July 14, 2004
| Tomas B Phillips
Posted on 07/15/2004 3:25:44 PM PDT by flightleader
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: Turbo Pig
Too bad the ditz's don't feel the same sense of outrage over the 3,000 dead Americans in their own country.
To: Viking2002
their thumbs up a certain orifice.
Most of the time it's their heads...
22
posted on
07/15/2004 5:24:47 PM PDT
by
ThreePuttinDude
(........Flush the 2 Johns.....)
To: flightleader
Bump for later read; I just got screamed at (all caps) for sending a pro-Bush article to a family member who is a shrieking leftie goon. I have a feeling I'll need this info for the next family reunion.
Man, that is going to be a scream.
23
posted on
07/15/2004 5:44:21 PM PDT
by
Marauder
(Show me a liberal and I'll show you a sick individual.)
To: flightleader
Here are two other arguments you can use, flightleader.
Regrading our strategic alliance with dictators...none of them was worse than Josef Stalin, who made Saddam look like a choir boy. When Hitler started WWII by marching into Poland from the West, Stalin was marching in from the East - the two had formed a strategic alliance. The Polish people would not enjoy liberation for another 45 years. But here's the truly embarrassing part for America. In 1933, Franklin Roosevelt recognized the Soviet Union - at a time when Stalin was force-starving 10 million Ukranian farmers! I would argue that the Soviet Union was more than just a strategic partner with the US. FDR enjoyed a warm relationship with this murderer, affectionately calling Stalin "Uncle Joe."
The second example I actually got from Hannity's book "Fear No Evil" Why did we supported Saddam in the 80's? It was more than just hostility toward Iran for taking our diplomats hostages. Iran, with the Shah was once a major US ally. The Shah wasn't a nice guy, but he kept a lid on the religious terrorists - until Jimmy Carter, as part of his human rights campaign, demanded that the Shah loosen up his treatement of these thugs. Carter asked the Shah to permit open trials, allow mass (and often violent) demonstrations by these zealots. And when the students went out of control, Carter demanded that the Shah take no action against them. Hannity lists a passage from Reagan's autobiography to show how Reagan felt about it.
"Our government's decision to stand piously by while he (the Shah) was forced from office led to the establishment of a despotic regime that was far more evil and far more tyrannical than the one it replaced. And as I was to learn through personal experience, it left a legacy of problems that would haunt our country for years to come."
Hope that helps.
24
posted on
07/15/2004 5:45:12 PM PDT
by
mwfsu84
(v)
To: flightleader
Good responses. Especially to the imminent threat statement. The President seemed clear enough at the time.
25
posted on
07/15/2004 5:52:31 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
To: flightleader
To: flightleader
Here's an exchange between me and a liberal on the Air America microphone:
Liberal: Bush is a liar.
Me: Britain still stands by their uranium report.
Liberal: Do you know how many women the British have raped?
[This answer manages to be outrageously untrue and preposterously beside the point as well. It's almost as if they purposely enrage you with their stupidity.]
Me: Why are you changing the subject? Liberals always change the subject.
But by this time the microphone was in front of her motor yap as she continued to tell the Air America audience of two how horrible the British are.
To: flightleader
To: flightleader; MS.BEHAVIN; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; Ms.Poohbear; tomkow6; HiJinx; MoJo2001; ...
Bumped, bookmarked, and PINGED because it's just so damn SPOT-ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great work!
29
posted on
07/15/2004 7:41:08 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: MeekOneGOP
Meek, this deserves a mega-ping if ever there was one!
30
posted on
07/15/2004 7:43:12 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: flightleader
Welcome to Free Republic! If your subsequent posts are this awesome, you'll have a LOT of fans pretty soon!
31
posted on
07/15/2004 7:44:16 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: firebrand
Why are you changing the subject? Liberals always change the subject.When on indefensible ground, move.
To: Long Cut
33
posted on
07/15/2004 7:57:06 PM PDT
by
mylife
(The roar of the masses could be farts)
To: Long Cut
34
posted on
07/15/2004 8:07:02 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: Long Cut
To: Marauder
You have my condolences Marauder. But as Mary Poppins says, "A spoon full of sugar helps the medicine go down."
To: mwfsu84
You are absolutely correct mwfsu84. I also read Sean's book and his assessment was dead-on. The US, or shall I say, the Democratic Party's relationship with the Soviet Union, particularly Stalin was shameful. It was understandable during the war howeve many Dems continued the love-fest long after. This was the catalyst for pushing many of the anti-Communist Leftist like Sydney Hook and Irving Howe into the neo-Conservative category. These men never relinquished their belief in Marxism yet even they found the Leftist love affair with America's enemies unequivocally distasteful.
To: firebrand
Air America may be an endless source of richly comical stupidity but they may get a favourable entry into the Physician's Desk Reference as a possible cure for Insomnia.
To: chainsaw
I usually get this:
Leftist - "Bush lied!"
Flagg - "About what?"
L - "He said Iraq was an imminent threat."
F - "No he didn't. post the link where Bush said that Iraq was an imminent threat."
l - "Well, he implied it!"
f - "Thank you for playing. You lose."
40
posted on
07/15/2004 10:43:21 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">Hatriotism)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson